Skip to main content

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Low- and Middle-Income vs High-Income Countries: The Role of Ventilator Bundle, Ventilation Practices, and Health Care Staffing.

Chest2025-01-14PubMed
Total: 73.0Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 7Citation: 8

Summary

In a 2,253-patient international cohort, LMIC status independently doubled VAP risk. Longer ventilation increased VAP, and higher nurse and physician staffing ratios reduced VAP, while ventilator bundle adherence showed no independent association after adjustment.

Key Findings

  • LMIC status independently associated with higher VAP risk (aOR 2.11; 95% CI 1.37–3.24).
  • Each increase in total ventilation duration increased VAP risk (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03–1.05).
  • Higher nurse (aOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79–0.98) and physician staffing (aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50–0.87) ratios associated with lower VAP; bundle adherence showed no independent association.

Clinical Implications

Prioritize minimizing ventilation duration and improving nurse/physician staffing ratios to reduce VAP; bundle elements remain important but may be insufficient without adequate staffing and systems.

Why It Matters

Shifts focus from bundle compliance to staffing and ventilation duration as modifiable drivers of VAP, informing ICU resource policy and quality improvement, especially in LMICs.

Limitations

  • Observational secondary analysis—causality cannot be inferred; potential unmeasured confounders (infrastructure, infection control).
  • Heterogeneity in VAP definitions and bundle implementation across sites may influence associations.

Future Directions

Prospective interventional studies to test staffing enhancements and ventilation weaning strategies on VAP; context-specific implementation science in LMIC ICUs.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Prevention
Evidence Level
II - Large multicenter observational cohort with adjusted analyses.
Study Design
OTHER