Skip to main content

Growth differentiation factor 15 aggravates sepsis-induced cognitive and memory impairments by promoting microglial inflammatory responses and phagocytosis.

Journal of neuroinflammation2025-02-22PubMed
Total: 73.5Innovation: 9Impact: 7Rigor: 6Citation: 8

Summary

In LPS-induced murine sepsis, CSF GDF15 rose markedly; intracerebroventricular anti-GDF15 (ponsegromab) mitigated cognitive and memory deficits, reduced microglial activation/phagocytosis, and prevented synaptic loss. In vitro, GDF15 enhanced microglial inflammatory cytokines and phagocytic activity, supporting a causal role.

Key Findings

  • CSF GDF15 levels increased significantly after LPS-induced sepsis in mice.
  • Intracerebroventricular anti-GDF15 (ponsegromab) improved fear-conditioning and novel object recognition performance.
  • GDF15 promoted microglial inflammatory cytokine production and phagocytosis; antibody treatment reduced microglial activation and protected synapses.

Clinical Implications

While preclinical, these data suggest GDF15 blockade could become a therapeutic strategy for sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Future clinical translation will need systemic delivery approaches, safety evaluation, and biomarker-guided patient selection.

Why It Matters

Identifies GDF15 as a mechanistic driver of neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment in sepsis and demonstrates target engagement with a therapeutic antibody, opening a translational pathway for SAE.

Limitations

  • LPS model may not capture the full complexity of polymicrobial sepsis
  • Intracerebroventricular delivery limits immediate clinical translatability; sample sizes not detailed in abstract

Future Directions

Evaluate systemic anti-GDF15 strategies, validate in polymicrobial sepsis models, define dosing windows, and assess interaction with sedation/analgesia regimens and long-term cognitive outcomes.

Study Information

Study Type
Basic/Mechanistic
Research Domain
Pathophysiology
Evidence Level
V - Preclinical animal and cell-based mechanistic evidence without clinical outcomes.
Study Design
OTHER