Skip to main content

Efficacy of perioperative dexmedetomidine in postoperative pain and neurocognitive functions in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

International journal of surgery (London, England)2025-03-05PubMed
Total: 81.0Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 9Citation: 8

Summary

Across 59 randomized trials (n=7,713), dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative pain (MD -0.50 VAS), opioid consumption (MD -11.91), and the incidence of POCD (RR 0.59) and POD (RR 0.49) after orthopedic surgery. Trial sequential analyses and sensitivity analyses supported result robustness.

Key Findings

  • Reduced postoperative pain (VAS MD -0.50) and opioid consumption (MD -11.91).
  • Lower incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RR 0.59) and postoperative delirium (RR 0.49).
  • Prolonged motor (MD 1.70) and sensory block (MD 1.80) and delayed time to first rescue analgesic (MD 1.51); TSA supported robustness.

Clinical Implications

Consider dexmedetomidine as part of multimodal analgesia/sedation in orthopedic surgery to reduce pain, opioids, delirium, and cognitive dysfunction; monitor for bradycardia and hypotension and tailor dosing to patient comorbidities.

Why It Matters

Synthesizes high-level evidence indicating dexmedetomidine improves analgesia and neurocognitive outcomes, addressing a critical perioperative quality metric.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity in dosing regimens, surgical procedures, and outcome timing across RCTs
  • Potential publication bias and limited reporting of adverse events across trials

Future Directions

Head-to-head trials to optimize dexmedetomidine dosing/timing and to balance hemodynamic risks; evaluation in high-risk cognitive populations with standardized delirium/cognition endpoints.

Study Information

Study Type
Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Treatment/Prognosis
Evidence Level
I - Synthesis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
Study Design
OTHER