Flexible-tip bougie vs. stylet for tracheal intubation with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope in critical care: a randomised controlled trial.
Total: 75.5Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 8Citation: 7
Summary
In ICU intubations using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, a flexible-tip bougie achieved a 99% first-attempt success rate versus 83% with a stylet, with less need for laryngeal manipulation and no increase in complications.
Key Findings
- First-attempt success: 99% (flexible-tip bougie) vs 83% (stylet), P=0.005.
- Fewer laryngeal manipulations with bougie: 10% vs 31.4%.
- No significant difference in complication rates between techniques.
- Operator-rated difficulty favored bougie (not difficult/slightly difficult in 99% vs 90%).
Clinical Implications
Prefer a flexible-tip bougie rather than a stylet when using hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes in ICU to maximize first-pass success and minimize adjunct maneuvers.
Why It Matters
Clear, clinically meaningful improvement in first-pass success supports changing default introducer choice for hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy in critical care.
Limitations
- Single-center trial and lack of blinding of operators
- Results limited to hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes; generalizability to standard blades uncertain
Future Directions
Validate findings across multiple centers, operator experience levels, and different hyperangulated platforms; assess effects on hypoxemia and hemodynamic instability.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Randomized controlled trial comparing introducers for ICU intubation
- Study Design
- OTHER