The effect of neuromuscular blocking reversal agents on perioperative neurocognitive function after general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Total: 74.0Innovation: 7Impact: 7Rigor: 8Citation: 7
Summary
Across 10 RCTs (n=1705), sugammadex reduced early PND versus neostigmine (RR 0.67) without increasing adverse events, while accelerating TOF recovery. This suggests a neurocognitive advantage to sugammadex in the immediate postoperative period.
Key Findings
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 RCTs including 1705 patients under general anesthesia.
- Sugammadex reduced early postoperative PND compared with neostigmine (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.48–0.94).
- No increase in adverse events (e.g., PONV, mortality); faster recovery to TOF ≥0.9.
Clinical Implications
When risk of early PND is a concern (e.g., older adults, cognitive vulnerability), clinicians may favor sugammadex over neostigmine, considering cost and availability.
Why It Matters
Addresses a clinically relevant and common outcome—PND—providing comparative evidence that may influence routine reversal agent selection.
Limitations
- Heterogeneity in PND definitions and neurocognitive tests; follow-up restricted to ≤7 days.
- Potential publication bias; limited trials directly comparing the same regimens.
Future Directions
Longer-term RCTs assessing sustained neurocognitive outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and subgroup effects (e.g., frailty, baseline cognitive impairment).
Study Information
- Study Type
- Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing reversal agents.
- Study Design
- OTHER