Skip to main content

The effect of neuromuscular blocking reversal agents on perioperative neurocognitive function after general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC anesthesiology2025-04-05PubMed
Total: 74.0Innovation: 7Impact: 7Rigor: 8Citation: 7

Summary

Across 10 RCTs (n=1705), sugammadex reduced early PND versus neostigmine (RR 0.67) without increasing adverse events, while accelerating TOF recovery. This suggests a neurocognitive advantage to sugammadex in the immediate postoperative period.

Key Findings

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 RCTs including 1705 patients under general anesthesia.
  • Sugammadex reduced early postoperative PND compared with neostigmine (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.48–0.94).
  • No increase in adverse events (e.g., PONV, mortality); faster recovery to TOF ≥0.9.

Clinical Implications

When risk of early PND is a concern (e.g., older adults, cognitive vulnerability), clinicians may favor sugammadex over neostigmine, considering cost and availability.

Why It Matters

Addresses a clinically relevant and common outcome—PND—providing comparative evidence that may influence routine reversal agent selection.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity in PND definitions and neurocognitive tests; follow-up restricted to ≤7 days.
  • Potential publication bias; limited trials directly comparing the same regimens.

Future Directions

Longer-term RCTs assessing sustained neurocognitive outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and subgroup effects (e.g., frailty, baseline cognitive impairment).

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing reversal agents.
Study Design
OTHER