Impact of Point-of-care Allogeneic Red Blood Cell Washing on Markers of Transfusion-related Respiratory Complications: A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial.
Summary
In 154 cardiac surgery patients randomized to washed versus standard allogeneic red blood cells, point-of-care washing did not reduce lung injury biomarkers, alter cardiopulmonary responses, or improve ICU/hospital length of stay, ventilator- or oxygen-free days, or rates of TRALI/TACO and mortality. The negative results counter the premise that washing mitigates transfusion-related respiratory complications.
Key Findings
- No differences in recipient lung injury biomarkers between washed and standard RBC groups after cardiac surgery.
- ICU stay, hospital stay, ventilator-free and oxygen-free days were similar between groups.
- Incidence of TRALI, TACO, acute kidney injury, and mortality showed no significant differences.
Clinical Implications
Routine point-of-care washing of allogeneic RBCs in cardiac surgery should not be expected to reduce TRALI/TACO risk or improve recovery; focus should remain on evidence-based transfusion practices and risk minimization.
Why It Matters
Provides rigorous evidence that a resource-intensive practice does not improve surrogate or clinical outcomes, informing transfusion stewardship and perioperative resource allocation.
Limitations
- Nonblinded intervention may introduce performance bias
- Primary outcomes were intermediate biomarkers; study may be underpowered for rare clinical events
Future Directions
Focus on alternative strategies to mitigate transfusion-related lung injury and identify high-risk phenotypes; consider targeted trials powered for clinical endpoints.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Prevention
- Evidence Level
- I - Randomized clinical trial across two centers with predefined endpoints
- Study Design
- OTHER