Skip to main content

Personalized Hemodynamic Resuscitation Targeting Capillary Refill Time in Early Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA2025-10-29PubMed
Total: 87.0Innovation: 8Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

In a 19-country multicenter RCT of early septic shock, a CRT-targeted personalized hemodynamic protocol achieved a significant win ratio (1.16) over usual care on a 28-day hierarchical composite outcome. The benefit was driven mainly by fewer days requiring vasoactive support, mechanical ventilation, and kidney replacement therapy.

Key Findings

  • Win ratio of 1.16 (95% CI 1.02–1.33; P=0.04) favoring CRT-personalized resuscitation for the 28-day hierarchical composite.
  • Primary benefit components: reduced duration of vital support (vasoactives, mechanical ventilation, kidney replacement therapy).
  • Trial spanned 86 centers in 19 countries; stratification by APACHE II supported robustness across illness severity.

Clinical Implications

Adopting CRT-guided personalized resuscitation may reduce exposure to vasoactives, ventilation, and kidney support in early septic shock. Implementation requires protocolized assessment of pulse pressure, diastolic pressure, fluid responsiveness, and point-of-care echocardiography.

Why It Matters

This trial provides high-level evidence that a simple bedside perfusion target (CRT) embedded in a personalized protocol can improve clinically meaningful composite outcomes in septic shock.

Limitations

  • Open-label pragmatic design with potential variability in usual care across centers.
  • Effect largely on support duration; individual mortality differences were not the main driver.

Future Directions

Evaluate mortality-focused endpoints, cost-effectiveness, and integration with other perfusion/echocardiographic targets; assess implementation fidelity and training needs.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Randomized, multicenter clinical trial providing highest level evidence for intervention effectiveness.
Study Design
OTHER