Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation vs Metoclopramide for Moderate to Severe Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Summary
In a multicenter, double-dummy randomized trial of 232 women with moderate-to-severe PONV after thyroid or anterior cervical surgery, wearable TEAS at PC6 achieved higher 2-hour remission (77.6% vs 55.2%; P<.001) and lower 24-hour relapse (12.2% vs 56.3%; P<.001) than metoclopramide, with no adverse events. The design included rerandomization for nonresponders at 2 hours.
Key Findings
- Higher 2-hour PONV remission with TEAS vs metoclopramide (77.6% vs 55.2%; P<.001).
- Lower 24-hour relapse with TEAS vs control (12.2% vs 56.3%; P<.001).
- No adverse events were reported in either group; double-dummy, blinded design across 4 centers.
- Rerandomization of nonresponders at 2 hours allowed cross-intervention evaluation.
Clinical Implications
TEAS at PC6 can be considered as an effective, well-tolerated rescue or adjunct for moderate-to-severe PONV, potentially reducing reliance on antiemetics and their adverse effects in enhanced recovery pathways.
Why It Matters
This rigorous RCT demonstrates a nonpharmacologic wearable therapy that outperforms a standard antiemetic for moderate-to-severe PONV, with excellent safety and potential to change antiemetic pathways.
Limitations
- Per-protocol analysis (not clearly ITT) may introduce bias.
- All participants were female and limited to thyroid/anterior cervical procedures in China, limiting generalizability; comparator was metoclopramide only.
Future Directions
Replicate in mixed-sex, broader surgical populations, compare against 5-HT3 antagonists and multimodal regimens, and assess integration into ERAS with cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial with active comparator.
- Study Design
- OTHER