Skip to main content

Polymyxin B haemoadsorption in endotoxic septic shock (Tigris): a multicentre, open-label, Bayesian, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

The Lancet. Respiratory medicine2026-03-27PubMed
Total: 84.0Innovation: 8Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

In a 19-center Bayesian phase 3 randomized trial of patients with biomarker-defined endotoxic septic shock, two sessions of polymyxin B hemoadsorption showed a high posterior probability of reducing mortality at 28 and 90 days versus standard care. Safety was acceptable overall, with two treatment-related serious adverse events reported.

Key Findings

  • At 28 days, mortality was 39% with polymyxin B versus 45% with control; posterior probability of benefit 95.3% (APACHE-II adjusted OR 0.67; 95% CrI 0.39–1.08).
  • At 90 days, posterior probability of benefit was 99.4% (adjusted OR 0.54; 95% CrI 0.32–0.87).
  • Serious adverse events occurred in 30% (polymyxin B) vs 22% (control); two were treatment-related.
  • Treatment consisted of two hemoadsorption sessions (90–120 min, 22 h apart) at 80–120 mL/min blood flow.

Clinical Implications

For vasopressor-dependent septic shock with high endotoxin activity (0.60–0.89) and multiorgan failure, centers with hemoperfusion capability may consider polymyxin B hemoadsorption as an adjunct to standard care, while weighing logistics, resource needs, and safety monitoring. Adoption should be accompanied by protocols for patient selection and outcome auditing.

Why It Matters

This trial provides the strongest prospective evidence to date that endotoxin-targeted hemoadsorption can improve survival in a rigorously phenotyped septic shock subgroup, supporting precision application of extracorporeal therapies.

Limitations

  • Open-label design and modest sample size (n=157) limit precision; 28-day credible interval crossed 1.0.
  • Generalizability beyond US centers and cost-effectiveness remain untested.

Future Directions

Undertake larger pragmatic RCTs with health-economic evaluation, refine patient selection algorithms (e.g., dynamic endotoxin trends), and compare hemoadsorption timing/‘dose’ strategies.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Level I evidence from a multicentre randomized controlled phase 3 trial using Bayesian analysis.
Study Design
OTHER