Skip to main content

Non-drug perioperative interventions to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)2026-04-11PubMed
Total: 85.5Innovation: 7Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

This PROSPERO-registered systematic review synthesized 255 RCTs (55,260 participants) of 10 classes and 39 subtypes of non-pharmacologic perioperative interventions for abdominal surgery. PPCs occurred in 11.7% across trials, and high-certainty evidence was identified for specific practices (including low FiO2) in preventing PPCs, establishing an evidence hierarchy with trial sequential analyses and GRADE.

Key Findings

  • Included 255 randomized trials (n=55,260) covering 10 intervention types and 39 subtypes for PPC prevention in abdominal surgery.
  • Across trials, 11.7% of participants developed PPCs, enabling precise pooled estimates.
  • High-certainty evidence was identified for specific practices, including low FiO2, and an evidence hierarchy was established using GRADE and trial sequential analysis.

Clinical Implications

Supports incorporating validated non-pharmacologic measures (e.g., appropriately titrated FiO2 and other evidenced practices) into ERAS pathways to reduce PPCs, guide oxygen administration, and standardize respiratory care bundles.

Why It Matters

Defines a rigorous, up-to-date evidence hierarchy for non-drug strategies to prevent PPCs in abdominal surgery, with direct implications for anesthetic and perioperative protocols.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity in intervention types and implementation details may limit direct comparability
  • Some PPC subtype definitions and perioperative co-interventions vary across trials

Future Directions

Prospective, standardized multicenter trials comparing prioritized bundles from the evidence hierarchy and evaluating implementation strategies within ERAS pathways.

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review
Research Domain
Prevention
Evidence Level
I - High-level evidence from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Study Design
OTHER