Confirmatory efficacy and safety trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus right unilateral ultra-brief electroconvulsive therapy in depression (CREST-MST): a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial in Canada and the USA.
Summary
In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind non-inferiority trial, MST achieved depression remission rates non-inferior to RUL-UB ECT (difference 5.3% favoring ECT; non-inferiority met) while causing substantially fewer autobiographical memory deficits (2.7% vs 17.3%). More ECT recipients discontinued due to non-serious adverse events, supporting MST’s favorable risk–benefit profile.
Key Findings
- MST remission rates were non-inferior to RUL-UB ECT (difference 5.3% favoring ECT; non-inferiority achieved, p=0.048).
- Autobiographical memory worsening was markedly lower with MST (2.7%) than with ECT (17.3%).
- Treatment discontinuations due to non-serious adverse events were more common with ECT (12 vs 3 in MST).
Clinical Implications
MST can be offered as an alternative to RUL-UB ECT, especially for patients prioritizing cognitive preservation or those refusing ECT, with anesthesia teams anticipating similar convulsive therapy workflows but reduced cognitive risks.
Why It Matters
This high-quality RCT provides definitive evidence that MST can be considered a first-line convulsive therapy with superior cognitive safety, potentially reshaping clinical practice and anesthesia workflows for convulsive treatments.
Limitations
- Enrollment ended before planned sample size; generalizability limited by predominantly White population
- Short-term outcomes during acute treatment phase; longer-term relapse and cognitive trajectories not reported
Future Directions
Head-to-head cost-effectiveness studies, longer-term cognitive and functional outcomes, and implementation studies to integrate MST into clinical pathways.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Multicenter randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
- Study Design
- OTHER