Skip to main content

Daily Ards Research Analysis

3 papers

Three studies advance neonatal and critical care respiratory science: (1) optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroids in pre-eclampsia reduces severe neonatal RDS and moderate-to-severe BPD; (2) lung ultrasound outperforms chest X-ray in predicting surfactant need in preterm RDS; (3) transcriptomic-immune analyses implicate lysosome-related pathways and identify CTSO and HLA-DQA1 as candidate biomarkers in sepsis-associated ARDS.

Summary

Three studies advance neonatal and critical care respiratory science: (1) optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroids in pre-eclampsia reduces severe neonatal RDS and moderate-to-severe BPD; (2) lung ultrasound outperforms chest X-ray in predicting surfactant need in preterm RDS; (3) transcriptomic-immune analyses implicate lysosome-related pathways and identify CTSO and HLA-DQA1 as candidate biomarkers in sepsis-associated ARDS.

Research Themes

  • Antenatal corticosteroid timing and neonatal respiratory outcomes
  • Point-of-care lung ultrasound for preterm RDS decision-making
  • Lysosome–immune axis and biomarkers in sepsis-associated ARDS

Selected Articles

1. The Interaction of Antenatal Steroid Timing and Pre-Eclampsia on Respiratory Outcomes Among Infants Born Preterm.

72Level IICohortThe Journal of pediatrics · 2025PMID: 40057023

In a prospective cohort of 1172 infants at 23–30 weeks’ gestation, antenatal corticosteroids given within 7 days of birth mitigated the increased risks of severe RDS and moderate-to-severe BPD associated with pre-eclampsia. Earlier (>7 days) steroid exposure was linked to higher risks, underscoring the importance of timing.

Impact: Clarifies a clinically actionable interaction between pre-eclampsia and steroid timing, guiding perinatal strategies to reduce severe respiratory morbidity.

Clinical Implications: Coordinate obstetric-neonatal care to administer antenatal corticosteroids within 7 days of anticipated delivery in pre-eclampsia to reduce severe RDS and BPD risk.

Key Findings

  • Among 1172 infants, 30% had maternal pre-eclampsia and 83% received antenatal steroids within 7 days of birth.
  • Pre-eclampsia with antenatal steroids given earlier than 7 days before birth was associated with increased severe RDS risk versus the reference (no pre-eclampsia with ≤7 days ANS).
  • Pre-eclampsia with antenatal steroids within 7 days was not associated with increased severe RDS risk.
  • Both non–pre-eclampsia with >7 days ANS and pre-eclampsia with >7 days ANS were associated with increased moderate-to-severe BPD risk; pre-eclampsia with ≤7 days ANS was not.

Methodological Strengths

  • Large prospective single-center cohort (N=1172) with predefined endpoints
  • Multivariable generalized estimating equations to adjust associations

Limitations

  • Single-center design limits generalizability
  • Observational design cannot fully rule out residual confounding (e.g., illness severity, delivery indications)

Future Directions: Multi-center validation and decision-analytic studies to operationalize timing protocols for antenatal steroids in pre-eclampsia.

2. CTSO and HLA-DQA1 as biomarkers in sepsis-associated ARDS: insights from RNA sequencing and immune infiltration analysis.

61.5Level IIICohortBMC infectious diseases · 2025PMID: 40055592

Bioinformatic analyses of sepsis with ARDS implicate lysosome-related metabolism and immune microenvironment remodeling, with increased T-cell and reduced dendritic cell infiltration. Single-cell validation highlighted CTSO and HLA-DQA1 expression in immune cells, and survival analyses suggested their prognostic potential.

Impact: Identifies candidate lysosome-immune biomarkers (CTSO, HLA-DQA1) in sepsis-associated ARDS that could guide risk stratification and therapeutic target discovery.

Clinical Implications: If validated, CTSO and HLA-DQA1 could support prognosis and patient stratification in sepsis-associated ARDS and inform therapies targeting lysosome–immune pathways.

Key Findings

  • Differentially expressed genes in sepsis with ARDS were enriched for lysosome-related metabolism and immune regulation pathways.
  • Immune infiltration analysis showed increased T-cell infiltration and reduced dendritic cell infiltration.
  • Single-cell sequencing confirmed CTSO and HLA-DQA1 expression in immune cells; survival analyses suggested prognostic relevance.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multi-layered bioinformatics pipeline (DEG, GSEA, WGCNA, PPI, miRNA networks)
  • Single-cell sequencing used to validate hub gene expression in immune cells

Limitations

  • Sample size and cohort characteristics not clearly reported in the abstract
  • Primarily computational/retrospective analyses with limited external validation; causality not established

Future Directions: Prospective, multi-center validation of CTSO and HLA-DQA1 with standardized assays and integration into predictive models for sepsis-associated ARDS.

3. Lung ultrasonography in the management of preterm (≤34 weeks) neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.

58Level IICohortPediatrics and neonatology · 2025PMID: 40057448

In 67 preterm neonates ≤34 weeks with suspected RDS, lung ultrasound scores predicted surfactant need with higher accuracy than chest X-ray (AUC 0.962 vs 0.811; sensitivity 95.6% vs 93.3%; specificity 91% vs 50%). LUS could serve as a superior bedside tool to guide timely surfactant therapy.

Impact: Supports replacing or complementing chest X-ray with lung ultrasound to guide surfactant therapy, potentially reducing radiation and improving decision accuracy.

Clinical Implications: Implement standardized LUS scoring in preterm RDS evaluation to inform surfactant administration and reduce reliance on chest radiography.

Key Findings

  • Two-thirds (67.2%) of preterm neonates with suspected RDS required surfactant.
  • Median LUS score was higher in those needing surfactant (12) versus those not needing it (8).
  • LUS score outperformed chest X-ray score for predicting surfactant need (AUC 0.962 vs 0.811; p < 0.001).
  • Sensitivity/specificity: LUS 95.6%/91% vs chest X-ray 93.3%/50%.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective design with blinding of NICU team to LUS and radiologist to chest X-ray report
  • Objective ROC analysis comparing LUS and chest X-ray scores

Limitations

  • Single-center study with a small sample size (N=67)
  • Clinical decision to administer surfactant relied on chest X-ray and clinical assessment, potentially biasing reference standard

Future Directions: Multi-center validation, inter-operator reliability studies, and integration of LUS into treatment algorithms for preterm RDS.