Daily Ards Research Analysis
A phase 2 randomized, double-blind trial found that inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin was safe but ineffective in improving outcomes for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prompting early futility termination. Registry data comparing venovenous ECMO in COVID-19- vs H1N1-associated ARDS showed similar acute brain injury frequency but markedly higher mortality with acute brain injury in both groups. In a prospective cohort from Nepal, antenatal corticosteroids substantially reduced neonata
Summary
A phase 2 randomized, double-blind trial found that inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin was safe but ineffective in improving outcomes for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prompting early futility termination. Registry data comparing venovenous ECMO in COVID-19- vs H1N1-associated ARDS showed similar acute brain injury frequency but markedly higher mortality with acute brain injury in both groups. In a prospective cohort from Nepal, antenatal corticosteroids substantially reduced neonatal respiratory distress and mortality in preterm infants, reinforcing implementation in resource-limited settings.
Research Themes
- ARDS therapeutics and trial futility signals
- ECMO-related neurologic complications and outcomes
- Perinatal interventions to prevent respiratory morbidity in preterm infants
Selected Articles
1. Safety and efficacy of inhaled PEG-ADM in ARDS patients: a randomised controlled trial.
In a multicenter phase 2 randomized, double-blind trial (n=90), inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin showed safety comparable to placebo but did not improve a composite clinical utility index or 28-day ventilator-free survival. Mortality and ongoing ventilation at days 28 and 60 were not different; the trial was stopped early for futility.
Impact: Provides rigorous negative evidence against a biologically plausible ARDS therapy, redirecting resources and future trials away from an ineffective intervention.
Clinical Implications: Do not adopt inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin for ARDS outside research. Focus clinical practice on proven supportive strategies and consider phenotypic enrichment in future trials.
Key Findings
- Both PEG-ADM doses were well tolerated with adverse events similar to placebo.
- No improvement in the composite clinical utility index was observed versus placebo.
- 28-day ventilator-free survival was lower in the 960 μg group (52%) versus 1920 μg (67%) and placebo (65%).
- No significant differences in mortality or need for ongoing ventilation at days 28 and 60; early futility termination.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter design with trial registration (NCT04417036).
- Dose-ranging evaluation with prespecified composite physiological and clinical endpoints.
Limitations
- Phase 2 sample size (n=90) may limit power to detect modest benefits.
- Heterogeneity of ARDS etiologies and care practices could dilute treatment effects; early stopping limits longer-term assessment.
Future Directions: Consider alternative delivery or systemic dosing of adrenomedullin, phenotype-enriched enrollment, and endpoints aligned with specific ARDS subphenotypes in larger phase 3 trials.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin (PEG-ADM) for the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A Phase 2a/b randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial was conducted. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were assigned to receive PEG-ADM 960 μg or 1920 μg, or placebo. The primary endpoints were safety, efficacy, and ventilator-free survival at Day 28. Efficacy was assessed using ventilator-free survival and the clinical utility index, a composite endpoint that includes extravascular lung water index, oxygenation index, non-pulmonary Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. RESULTS: Ninety patients were randomised (PEG-ADM 960 μg: n = 29; PEG-ADM 1920 μg: n = 30; placebo: n = 31). Both dosages of PEG-ADM were well tolerated, with adverse event profiles similar to placebo. However, no significant efficacy was observed on the clinical utility index. Ventilator-free survival at Day 28 was lower in the PEG-ADM 960 μg group (52%) compared with the PEG-ADM 1920 μg (67%) and placebo (65%) groups. No significant differences were noted in overall mortality or the need for continued ventilation at Days 28 and 60. CONCLUSION: Inhaled PEG-ADM was well tolerated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, but it did not improve clinical outcomes, which led to the early discontinuation after the first part of the trial for futility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04417036 (date of registration: 4 June 2020).
2. Effectiveness of Antenatal Corticosteroids in reducing morbidities and mortality in Preterm neonates: Evidence from a Tertiary Level Hospital in Nepal.
In a single-center prospective cohort (n=358) of preterm infants <34 weeks, antenatal corticosteroids were associated with markedly lower risks of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, need for mechanical ventilation, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality. Adjusted analyses showed substantially higher odds of adverse outcomes when ACS were not given.
Impact: Provides prospective, adjusted evidence from a low-resource setting confirming the substantial benefits of antenatal corticosteroids for very preterm births.
Clinical Implications: Reinforce implementation of ACS for threatened preterm birth <34 weeks, including protocols, supply chains, and training in resource-limited hospitals to reduce respiratory morbidity and mortality.
Key Findings
- ACS exposure was linked to lower rates of RDS (21.8% vs 61.8%, p<0.001) and NEC (5.8% vs 19.7%, p<0.001).
- Non-ACS was associated with higher odds of RDS (aOR 4.181, 95% CI 2.462-7.100) and mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.266, 95% CI 1.300-3.950).
- Non-ACS was associated with increased prolonged hospitalization (aOR 3.321, 95% CI 1.957-5.638) and mortality (aOR 5.731, 95% CI 3.199-10.266).
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective cohort design with multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounders.
- Real-world evidence from a resource-limited tertiary hospital setting.
Limitations
- Non-randomized single-center design prone to selection bias (ACS more often given with complications).
- Short-term in-hospital outcomes; long-term neurodevelopmental effects not assessed.
Future Directions: Implementation research to optimize ACS uptake, timing, and dosing in low-resource settings, and to evaluate long-term outcomes including neurodevelopment.
BACKGROUND: The use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in mothers less than 34 weeks' period of gestation has shown promising results with significant reduction in neonatal mortality and morbidities in high income settings. This study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of ACS in terms of neonatal outcome in less than 34 weeks in resource limited settings. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 15 March 2022 to 14 March 2023 among the babies born before 34 weeks' period of gestation (POG), in Paropakar maternity hospital, Nepal. Descriptive statistics using frequency and percentages was used to describe the socio-demographic, obstetric and neonatal characteristics. Multi-variable logistic regression analysis was done to assess the significance of ACS against various neonatal conditions. RESULTS: Out of 358 preterm neonates (<34 weeks), 206 were born to mothers who received ACS and 152 to mothers who did not. Mothers having any complications during delivery were more likely to receive ACS, (69.7% vs 50.0%, p = 0.002). Newborns of mothers who received ACS had significantly lower rates of respiratory distress syndrome (21.8% vs 61.8%, p < 0.001), necrotizing enterocolitis (5.8% vs 19.7%, p < 0.001), perinatal asphyxia (18.4% vs 35.5%, p < 0.001), neonatal sepsis (32.0% vs 43.4%, p < 0.027), and need for mechanical ventilation (15.5% vs 41.4%, p < 0.001). Newborn of mothers who did not receive ACS had higher odds of respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted odds ratio (a0R): 4.181, 95% CI: 2.462-7.100) and the need for mechanical ventilation (a0R: 2.266, 95% CI: 1.300-3.950). Lack of exposure to ACS was associated with higher odds of prolonged hospital stay (aOR: 3.321, 95% CI: 1.957-5.638) and mortality (aOR: 5.731, 95% CI: 3.199-10.266). CONCLUSION: ACS was more frequently used in mothers of less than 34 weeks POG having some complications during pregnancy. Use of ACS in deliveries of less than 34 weeks POG was associated with reduced risk of RDS, NEC and need for Mechanical Ventilation along with decrease hospital stay and neonatal mortality. Strengthening national guidelines with recommendation for the use of ACS in mothers less than 34 weeks POG can avert deaths due to complications of prematurity and help save more newborns.
3. Acute Brain Injury in COVID-19 Versus Influenza A Patients on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.
In a matched ELSO registry cohort (n=674), acute brain injury occurred at similar rates in COVID-19 and H1N1 ARDS patients on VV-ECMO, but hemorrhagic events were fewer in COVID-19, while overall mortality was higher. Across both etiologies, acute brain injury was associated with dramatically increased mortality.
Impact: Clarifies neurologic complication risks and their prognostic impact across major viral ARDS etiologies during VV-ECMO, informing monitoring and anticoagulation strategies.
Clinical Implications: Prioritize rigorous neuro-monitoring for ARDS patients on VV-ECMO; anticipate high mortality with ABI and consider strategies to minimize bleeding while maintaining thrombosis control.
Key Findings
- In matched analysis, ABI frequency was similar in COVID-19 (10%) vs H1N1 (12%) ARDS on VV-ECMO (aOR 0.83; p=0.53).
- COVID-19 had fewer hemorrhagic complications compared with H1N1 (aOR 0.27; p<0.001), with no difference in thrombosis (aOR 0.67; p=0.06).
- Mortality was higher in COVID-19 vs H1N1 (aOR 2.17; p<0.001).
- ABI was associated with markedly higher mortality in both groups (COVID: 94% vs 40%; H1N1: 75% vs 29%).
Methodological Strengths
- Large international registry with propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment.
- Direct comparison of two major viral ARDS etiologies on a uniform support modality (VV-ECMO).
Limitations
- Retrospective registry design with potential unmeasured confounding.
- Heterogeneity in center practices (e.g., anticoagulation protocols and neuroimaging) may affect event detection.
Future Directions: Prospective studies to standardize anticoagulation and neuro-monitoring during VV-ECMO and to identify modifiable risk factors for ABI across ARDS etiologies.
OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist on outcomes in COVID-19- vs. influenza A (H1N1)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients when supported on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We aimed to compare acute brain injury (ABI) frequency, thrombotic, and hemorrhagic complications and mortality in COVID-19- vs. H1N1-associated ARDS patients on venovenous ECMO. DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter observational cohort study. SETTING: Data reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization by up to 534 ECMO centers from 2009 to 2021. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years or older with COVID-19 or H1N1 requiring venovenous ECMO support. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 2253 venovenous ECMO patients (1916 COVID-19 and 337 H1N1). We employed propensity score matching followed by multivariable logistic regression to compare outcomes. The primary outcome was ABI and secondary outcomes were thrombosis, hemorrhage, and mortality. After matching, 674 patients (337 COVID and 337 H1N1) remained (median age = 41, 55% male). In the matched cohort, 10% of COVID-19 patients experienced ABI compared with 12% of H1N1 patients, with no significant difference between the groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.44-1.54; p = 0.53). There was no difference in thrombotic complications (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.02; p = 0.06), but COVID-19 patients had fewer hemorrhagic complications (aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.17-0.42; p < 0.001) compared with H1N1. Mortality was higher in COVID patients (aOR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.45-3.23; p < 0.001). In both groups, however, patients with ABI had higher mortality than those without, with 94% vs. 40% ( p < 0.001) for COVID and 75% vs. 29% ( p < 0.001) for H1N1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 and H1N1 patients on venovenous ECMO exhibited similar ABI frequency, which was twice that observed in the general historical ARDS patients supported on venovenous ECMO population. Our findings highlight that both COVID and H1N1 ARDS increase ABI frequency in ECMO patients. Finally, the presence of ABI doubled mortality among both COVID and H1N1.