Investigation of the protective effect of cilostazol on acute lung injury-mediated inflammation and in silico molecular modelling studies of inflammatory signalling pathway: a repurposing study.
Summary
In an LPS-induced rat ALI model, cilostazol bound multiple inflammatory proteins in silico and reduced oxidative stress, cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α), KL-6, LDH, MPO, CRP, NO, edema, vascular leakage, and inflammatory cell recruitment in vivo. It downregulated TNF-α, NF-κB, TLR4, and JAK/STAT3 mRNA and improved total lung capacity, supporting repurposing for ALI/ARDS.
Key Findings
- In silico docking predicted cilostazol binding to 10 inflammatory targets (PDK1, RAC1, PTK6, KDR/VEGFR2, EGFR, endothelin-1, caspase-3, TNF-α, NF-κB1/BTK, TLR/IRAK4) with affinities comparable to known inhibitors.
- In vivo, cilostazol reduced oxidative stress, pulmonary edema, vascular leakage, and inflammatory mediators (IL-6, TNF-α, NO, CRP, LDH, MPO, KL-6) and decreased inflammatory cell recruitment in LPS-induced ALI.
- Cilostazol downregulated mRNA expression of TNF-α, NF-κB, TLR4, and JAK/STAT3 and improved total lung capacity in rats.
Clinical Implications
Although preclinical, findings justify exploration of cilostazol as an adjunctive anti-inflammatory therapy for ALI/ARDS, with careful attention to bleeding risk and dosing. Clinical trials are needed to assess efficacy, safety, and patient selection.
Why It Matters
This study identifies multi-target anti-inflammatory actions of cilostazol and demonstrates preclinical efficacy in ALI, suggesting a plausible therapeutic strategy for ARDS. The integrative in silico–in vivo approach provides mechanistic insight for repurposing.
Limitations
- Preclinical single-species LPS model; human efficacy and safety unknown
- Sample size, randomization/blinding, and dose–response details not reported in the abstract; docking does not prove target engagement
Future Directions
Validate across multiple ALI/ARDS models (e.g., ventilator-induced, acid aspiration), establish dose–response and pharmacokinetics, assess bleeding risks, and progress to phase 1/2 trials to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Basic/mechanistic experiment
- Research Domain
- Treatment, Pathophysiology
- Evidence Level
- V - Preclinical in vivo animal study without human data
- Study Design
- OTHER