Skip to main content

Severity of Impaired Oxygenation and Conservative Oxygenation Targets in Mechanically Ventilated Children: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the Oxy-PICU Trial of Conservative Oxygenation.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2025-01-13PubMed
Total: 65.5Innovation: 6Impact: 7Rigor: 7Citation: 6

Summary

In a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Oxy-PICU RCT (n=1,775), conservative oxygenation (SpO2 88–92%) benefited mechanically ventilated children irrespective of severe oxygenation impairment (OSI≥12). No significant interaction by OSI category was detected, supporting broad application of conservative targets.

Key Findings

  • Data from 1,775 of 1,986 eligible children were analyzed; 212 had OSI ≥ 12 at randomization.
  • The composite primary outcome did not differ significantly by OSI category; conservative oxygenation benefited both OSI < 12 (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71–1.01) and OSI ≥ 12 (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.49–1.84).
  • Findings do not support limiting conservative oxygenation targets to children with severely impaired oxygenation.

Clinical Implications

PICUs can implement SpO2 88–92% targets in ventilated children across oxygenation severities, with ongoing monitoring for safety; future prospective stratified trials can refine thresholds.

Why It Matters

Clarifies that conservative oxygenation targets can be applied broadly in pediatric invasive ventilation, not only in those with severe hypoxemia, informing protocol standardization.

Limitations

  • Post hoc subgroup analysis of an open-label trial; not pre-specified
  • Findings are associative within subgroups and require prospective confirmation

Future Directions

Prospective stratified trials to confirm conservative oxygenation benefits across severity strata and to assess safety endpoints (e.g., ischemic events, neurodevelopment) under lower SpO2 targets.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
II - Post hoc subgroup analysis from a multicenter RCT (Oxy-PICU)
Study Design
OTHER