Skip to main content

Level of sedation in patients with COVID-19 supported with ECMO: A comparative analysis of the critical care consortium international database.

Perfusion2025-02-26PubMed
Total: 62.0Innovation: 7Impact: 7Rigor: 5Citation: 7

Summary

In a multicenter retrospective cohort of 328 COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO, lighter sedation (without continuous NMBA) was associated with substantially lower 90-day in-hospital mortality (HR 3.23 for high vs low sedation) and fewer infectious/hemorrhagic complications, despite longer ECMO runs and more circuit changes. Baseline severity was similar except for lower PaO2/FiO2 in the high-sedation group.

Key Findings

  • High sedation (continuous NMBA) was associated with a 3.23-fold higher hazard of death vs low sedation.
  • Low-sedation patients had fewer infectious and hemorrhagic complications but longer ECMO runs and more circuit changes.
  • Baseline disease severity was similar; PaO2/FiO2 was lower in the high-sedation group.

Clinical Implications

Consider targeting lighter sedation and avoiding continuous neuromuscular blockade during VV-ECMO for ARDS, with vigilance for longer ECMO duration and circuit management.

Why It Matters

These data challenge the entrenched paradigm of deep sedation and continuous paralysis during VV-ECMO for ARDS, suggesting safer, lighter sedation may improve survival and complications.

Limitations

  • Retrospective observational design with potential confounding by indication
  • Sedation exposure categorization may be imperfect; COVID-specific context may limit generalizability

Future Directions

Prospective trials comparing light vs deep sedation strategies during VV-ECMO, including patient-centered outcomes and neurocognitive sequelae.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
III - Retrospective multicenter cohort analysis with adjusted survival modeling
Study Design
OTHER