Level of sedation in patients with COVID-19 supported with ECMO: A comparative analysis of the critical care consortium international database.
Summary
In a multicenter retrospective cohort of 328 COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO, lighter sedation (without continuous NMBA) was associated with substantially lower 90-day in-hospital mortality (HR 3.23 for high vs low sedation) and fewer infectious/hemorrhagic complications, despite longer ECMO runs and more circuit changes. Baseline severity was similar except for lower PaO2/FiO2 in the high-sedation group.
Key Findings
- High sedation (continuous NMBA) was associated with a 3.23-fold higher hazard of death vs low sedation.
- Low-sedation patients had fewer infectious and hemorrhagic complications but longer ECMO runs and more circuit changes.
- Baseline disease severity was similar; PaO2/FiO2 was lower in the high-sedation group.
Clinical Implications
Consider targeting lighter sedation and avoiding continuous neuromuscular blockade during VV-ECMO for ARDS, with vigilance for longer ECMO duration and circuit management.
Why It Matters
These data challenge the entrenched paradigm of deep sedation and continuous paralysis during VV-ECMO for ARDS, suggesting safer, lighter sedation may improve survival and complications.
Limitations
- Retrospective observational design with potential confounding by indication
- Sedation exposure categorization may be imperfect; COVID-specific context may limit generalizability
Future Directions
Prospective trials comparing light vs deep sedation strategies during VV-ECMO, including patient-centered outcomes and neurocognitive sequelae.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Cohort
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- III - Retrospective multicenter cohort analysis with adjusted survival modeling
- Study Design
- OTHER