High-frequency oscillatory ventilation with volume guarantee in infants: a systematic review.
Summary
Across 11 studies (including three RCTs; n=785), HFOV with volume guarantee increased survival free of grade 2–3 BPD versus HFOV alone (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.66–5.98). Signals suggested shorter invasive ventilation and hospital stay and potential reductions in mortality and air leak, though overall BPD incidence was unchanged.
Key Findings
- HFOV-VG increased survival free of grade 2–3 BPD versus HFOV alone (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.66–5.98).
- No reduction in overall BPD incidence was observed compared with HFOV alone.
- Signals of shorter invasive ventilation and hospital stay, with potential reductions in mortality and air leak syndrome.
Clinical Implications
When HFOV is selected for preterm infants (<32 weeks GA), combining VG may improve survival free of severe BPD and shorten support, but practice should await confirmation from large multicenter RCTs.
Why It Matters
Synthesizing RCTs and observational data, this review informs neonatal ventilatory strategy by indicating potential benefits of HFOV-VG on clinically meaningful outcomes.
Limitations
- Heterogeneity across study designs and populations; limited number of RCTs.
- Potential publication bias and lack of uniform definitions of outcomes.
Future Directions
Conduct adequately powered, multicenter RCTs to confirm effects of HFOV-VG on BPD grades, mortality, and ventilator days, and to define optimal settings.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Systematic review and meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials.
- Study Design
- OTHER