Clinical efficacy of invimestrocel for acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pneumonia: Comparison with historical data using propensity score analysis.
Summary
In pneumonia-induced ARDS, invimestrocel recipients had significantly more ventilator-free days and improved survival compared with a propensity score–matched historical cohort, supporting a potential therapeutic benefit of this cell-based intervention.
Key Findings
- Compared with matched historical controls (n=20), invimestrocel recipients (n=20) had higher ventilator-free days (14.8±11.0 vs 6.7±9.4; 95% CI 1.4–14.7; p=0.011).
- Survival was improved with invimestrocel (log-rank HR 0.330; 95% CI 0.116–0.938).
- Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics between groups.
Clinical Implications
Invimestrocel may shorten ventilation duration and improve survival in pneumonia-induced ARDS; however, adoption requires confirmation in adequately powered randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trials.
Why It Matters
Provides comparative clinical effectiveness signals for a regenerative cell therapy in ARDS, an area with few disease-modifying treatments.
Limitations
- Small sample size (20 vs 20) and nonrandomized, historical comparison design.
- Potential residual confounding and selection bias despite matching; incomplete detailing of matching covariates in abstract.
Future Directions
Conduct randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter trials with predefined multiplicity control to confirm efficacy and safety and to identify responsive ARDS subphenotypes.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Cohort
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- III - Nonrandomized comparative cohort using propensity score–matched historical controls
- Study Design
- OTHER