Skip to main content

Clinical efficacy of invimestrocel for acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pneumonia: Comparison with historical data using propensity score analysis.

Regenerative therapy2025-03-24PubMed
Total: 63.5Innovation: 8Impact: 7Rigor: 5Citation: 6

Summary

In pneumonia-induced ARDS, invimestrocel recipients had significantly more ventilator-free days and improved survival compared with a propensity score–matched historical cohort, supporting a potential therapeutic benefit of this cell-based intervention.

Key Findings

  • Compared with matched historical controls (n=20), invimestrocel recipients (n=20) had higher ventilator-free days (14.8±11.0 vs 6.7±9.4; 95% CI 1.4–14.7; p=0.011).
  • Survival was improved with invimestrocel (log-rank HR 0.330; 95% CI 0.116–0.938).
  • Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics between groups.

Clinical Implications

Invimestrocel may shorten ventilation duration and improve survival in pneumonia-induced ARDS; however, adoption requires confirmation in adequately powered randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trials.

Why It Matters

Provides comparative clinical effectiveness signals for a regenerative cell therapy in ARDS, an area with few disease-modifying treatments.

Limitations

  • Small sample size (20 vs 20) and nonrandomized, historical comparison design.
  • Potential residual confounding and selection bias despite matching; incomplete detailing of matching covariates in abstract.

Future Directions

Conduct randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter trials with predefined multiplicity control to confirm efficacy and safety and to identify responsive ARDS subphenotypes.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
III - Nonrandomized comparative cohort using propensity score–matched historical controls
Study Design
OTHER