The effect of culture on the benefits of awake prone positioning for adults with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Summary
In 22 RCTs with 3615 adults, awake prone positioning reduced intubation risk (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.90), with stronger effects in countries with higher Power Distance Index (RR 0.67) and equivocal effects in lower-PDI settings (RR 0.89). The authors conclude APP also reduces mortality overall, but its clinical significance is modulated by cultural context and adherence.
Key Findings
- Meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n=3615) shows APP reduces intubation risk (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.90).
- Effects stronger in high-PDI nations (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.82) and equivocal in low-PDI nations (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75–1.05).
- APP associated with mortality reduction overall; higher adherence and lower intubation rates observed in high-PDI settings.
Clinical Implications
APP should be prioritized in settings with high adherence and authority structures, while programs to improve adherence may unlock benefits in low-PDI contexts. Clinicians should consider cultural and organizational factors when implementing APP protocols.
Why It Matters
By reconciling conflicting trial signals and introducing culture (PDI) as a moderator, this meta-analysis refines when and where awake prone positioning is most beneficial, informing guideline implementation strategies globally.
Limitations
- Cultural index is ecological and may proxy unmeasured system-level factors (e.g., staffing, resources).
- Heterogeneity in APP protocols and adherence; publication and performance bias cannot be excluded.
Future Directions
Implementation trials to enhance APP adherence in low-PDI settings; standardization of APP dose (duration/frequency); extension to non-COVID ARDS and evaluation of patient-centered outcomes.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Meta-analysis
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Study Design
- OTHER