Circulating endothelial signatures correlate with worse outcomes in COVID-19, respiratory failure and ARDS.
Summary
Using unsupervised deconvolution of blood transcriptomes, the authors quantified circulating endothelial cell signatures that were higher at baseline in non-survivors and independently associated with 28-day mortality. Elevated signatures also tracked worse respiratory trajectories, supporting a non-invasive biomarker of endothelial injury relevant to ARDS pathobiology.
Key Findings
- Baseline ECS% was higher in non-survivors vs survivors in adults with COVID-19 (2.9% vs 2.7%, n=932, p<0.001).
- Each 1% increase in baseline ECS% independently increased mortality risk (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03–1.79).
- In ventilated pediatric patients, day 0 ECS% was higher in non-survivors (2.8% vs 2.6%, n=244, p<0.05).
- Higher ECS% associated with worse respiratory trajectories across oxygen-requirement categories (p<0.001).
Clinical Implications
ECS% could inform early risk stratification and trial enrichment for endothelial-targeted therapies in ARDS and severe COVID-19, enabling non-invasive monitoring of vascular injury.
Why It Matters
Introduces a scalable transcriptomic metric of endothelial damage with prognostic value across pediatric and adult cohorts, bridging mechanism and risk stratification in ARDS-related respiratory failure.
Limitations
- Observational design limits causal inference and residual confounding may persist.
- Deconvolution-based ECS% depends on reference signatures and may vary across platforms and sample processing.
Future Directions
Prospective validation with predefined thresholds, integration into clinical decision-support, and biomarker-driven trials testing endothelial-targeted therapies in ARDS.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Cohort
- Research Domain
- Prognosis
- Evidence Level
- III - Prospective/retrospective cohort analyses showing prognostic associations
- Study Design
- OTHER