Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of inhaled PEG-ADM in ARDS patients: a randomised controlled trial.

Critical care (London, England)2025-10-24PubMed
Total: 81.0Innovation: 8Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

In a multicenter phase 2 randomized, double-blind trial (n=90), inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin showed safety comparable to placebo but did not improve a composite clinical utility index or 28-day ventilator-free survival. Mortality and ongoing ventilation at days 28 and 60 were not different; the trial was stopped early for futility.

Key Findings

  • Both PEG-ADM doses were well tolerated with adverse events similar to placebo.
  • No improvement in the composite clinical utility index was observed versus placebo.
  • 28-day ventilator-free survival was lower in the 960 μg group (52%) versus 1920 μg (67%) and placebo (65%).
  • No significant differences in mortality or need for ongoing ventilation at days 28 and 60; early futility termination.

Clinical Implications

Do not adopt inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin for ARDS outside research. Focus clinical practice on proven supportive strategies and consider phenotypic enrichment in future trials.

Why It Matters

Provides rigorous negative evidence against a biologically plausible ARDS therapy, redirecting resources and future trials away from an ineffective intervention.

Limitations

  • Phase 2 sample size (n=90) may limit power to detect modest benefits.
  • Heterogeneity of ARDS etiologies and care practices could dilute treatment effects; early stopping limits longer-term assessment.

Future Directions

Consider alternative delivery or systemic dosing of adrenomedullin, phenotype-enriched enrollment, and endpoints aligned with specific ARDS subphenotypes in larger phase 3 trials.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase 2 trial.
Study Design
OTHER