Skip to main content

The utility of angiopoietin-2 and blood cell-derived biomarker indices in differentiating rapidly improving acute respiratory distress syndrome (RIARDS) phenotype from persistent-ARDS: a prospective observational study.

Annals of medicine2025-12-09PubMed
Total: 70.0Innovation: 7Impact: 7Rigor: 7Citation: 7

Summary

In a prospective ARDS cohort (n=193), lower plasma angiopoietin-2 independently predicted the rapidly improving ARDS phenotype and was associated with better ICU survival. A cut-off of 5896 pg/mL yielded AUC 0.731 with high specificity (88.9%), supporting early biomarker-based prognostic enrichment.

Key Findings

  • RIARDS occurred in 18.6% overall, most frequent in mild ARDS (52.9%) versus moderate (19.2%) and severe (10.4%).
  • Angiopoietin-2 independently predicted RIARDS; a 5896 pg/mL cut-off achieved AUC 0.731 with 88.9% specificity and 57.3% sensitivity.
  • Patients with Ang-2 <5896 pg/mL were more likely to experience RIARDS (86.1% vs 13.9%, p<0.001).
  • RIARDS phenotype showed significantly better ICU survival on Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Clinical Implications

Early Ang-2 measurement could guide expectations for rapid improvement, inform ventilator weaning trials, and prioritize resources, while supporting stratification in interventional studies.

Why It Matters

Identifying RIARDS at presentation using a vascular leakage biomarker enables precision phenotyping, trial enrichment, and tailored ventilatory strategies. It addresses prognostic heterogeneity in ARDS.

Limitations

  • Single-center study without external validation; moderate AUC and modest sensitivity
  • Observational design precludes causal inference; potential confounding remains

Future Directions

External validation, integration into multimarker panels and clinical scores, and use for prognostic enrichment in ARDS interventional trials.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Diagnosis/Prognosis
Evidence Level
III - Well-designed prospective observational cohort without randomization
Study Design
OTHER