Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Total: 84.0Innovation: 7Impact: 9Rigor: 9Citation: 9
Summary
Pooling four RCTs (n=4,092), OAC monotherapy reduced major bleeding (HR 0.59) versus OAC+single antiplatelet without increasing ischemic events or mortality. Results support OAC alone for AF with stable CAD beyond the acute coronary period.
Key Findings
- No significant difference in ischemic composite outcomes between OAC monotherapy and OAC+SAPT (HR 0.90).
- Major bleeding significantly lower with OAC monotherapy (3.3% vs 5.7%; HR 0.59).
- Findings consistent across subgroups; exploratory signal suggests greater bleeding reduction in men.
Clinical Implications
In AF with stable CAD beyond the early post-ACS/PCI phase, prefer OAC monotherapy to minimize bleeding; reserve antiplatelet therapy for compelling coronary indications.
Why It Matters
Resolves a common clinical dilemma by synthesizing randomized evidence favoring OAC monotherapy in AF with stable CAD, likely shaping guidelines and deprescribing practices.
Limitations
- Only four RCTs; some were not powered for individual effectiveness endpoints
- Heterogeneity in OAC agents, SAPT use, and follow-up durations
Future Directions
Head-to-head trials or IPD meta-analyses stratifying by coronary complexity, time from PCI, and bleeding risk to refine patient-level recommendations.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Meta-analysis
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Pooled randomized trials provide high-level evidence
- Study Design
- OTHER