Skip to main content

Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology2025-02-07PubMed
Total: 84.0Innovation: 7Impact: 9Rigor: 9Citation: 9

Summary

Pooling four RCTs (n=4,092), OAC monotherapy reduced major bleeding (HR 0.59) versus OAC+single antiplatelet without increasing ischemic events or mortality. Results support OAC alone for AF with stable CAD beyond the acute coronary period.

Key Findings

  • No significant difference in ischemic composite outcomes between OAC monotherapy and OAC+SAPT (HR 0.90).
  • Major bleeding significantly lower with OAC monotherapy (3.3% vs 5.7%; HR 0.59).
  • Findings consistent across subgroups; exploratory signal suggests greater bleeding reduction in men.

Clinical Implications

In AF with stable CAD beyond the early post-ACS/PCI phase, prefer OAC monotherapy to minimize bleeding; reserve antiplatelet therapy for compelling coronary indications.

Why It Matters

Resolves a common clinical dilemma by synthesizing randomized evidence favoring OAC monotherapy in AF with stable CAD, likely shaping guidelines and deprescribing practices.

Limitations

  • Only four RCTs; some were not powered for individual effectiveness endpoints
  • Heterogeneity in OAC agents, SAPT use, and follow-up durations

Future Directions

Head-to-head trials or IPD meta-analyses stratifying by coronary complexity, time from PCI, and bleeding risk to refine patient-level recommendations.

Study Information

Study Type
Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Pooled randomized trials provide high-level evidence
Study Design
OTHER