Skip to main content

DCDD heart transplantation with thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion and static cold storage: The experience in Spain.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2025-02-25PubMed
Total: 81.5Innovation: 8Impact: 9Rigor: 8Citation: 8

Summary

In a nationwide prospective cohort (98 DCDD vs 347 DNDD recipients), TA-NRP with static cold storage yielded similar 30-day and 1-year outcomes and severe primary graft failure rates compared with DNDD hearts. Inverse probability weighting confirmed no association between DCDD status and the primary composite outcome.

Key Findings

  • Among 98 DCDD and 347 DNDD transplants, the 1-year composite of all-cause death or severe primary graft failure was similar (21.4% vs 22.2%; P=0.87).
  • Thirty-day and 1-year survival were comparable between DCDD and DNDD recipients (94.9%/88.8% vs 93.7%/87.3%; P=0.70).
  • Inverse probability weighting showed no association of DCDD status with the primary endpoint (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.58–1.62; P=0.91).

Clinical Implications

Centers can consider TA-NRP plus static cold storage for DCD heart procurement with expectations of 1-year outcomes comparable to DNDD, potentially reducing waitlist mortality.

Why It Matters

Demonstrates that DCD hearts procured with TA-NRP can safely expand the donor pool without compromising 1-year outcomes, informing program design and policy.

Limitations

  • Non-randomized design leaves room for residual confounding
  • Short-term (1-year) outcomes; longer-term graft function and coronary allograft vasculopathy not assessed

Future Directions

Evaluate long-term outcomes (e.g., allograft vasculopathy), cost-effectiveness, and protocol optimization (TA-NRP duration, storage strategies) in randomized or carefully controlled prospective studies.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Prognosis
Evidence Level
II - Prospective multicenter cohort with causal adjustment comparing DCDD vs DNDD heart transplantation
Study Design
OTHER