Skip to main content

Electrocardiogram-based deep learning to predict left ventricular systolic dysfunction in paediatric and adult congenital heart disease in the USA: a multicentre modelling study.

The Lancet. Digital health2025-03-28PubMed
Total: 85.5Innovation: 8Impact: 8Rigor: 9Citation: 9

Summary

In >49,000 patients and >200,000 ECG–echocardiogram pairs spanning paediatric and adult congenital heart disease, a CNN-based AI-ECG achieved AUROC 0.95 (internal) and 0.96 (external) for detecting LVEF ≤40%. AI-ECG high-risk classification predicted future LV dysfunction and mortality across lesion subgroups; salient ECG features localized to precordial QRS/T territories.

Key Findings

  • CNN trained on paired ECG–echo data achieved AUROC 0.95 (AUPRC 0.33) internally and AUROC 0.96 (AUPRC 0.25) externally for detecting LVEF ≤40%.
  • AI-ECG high-risk classification in patients with LVEF >40% predicted future LV dysfunction (HR 12.1) and higher mortality risk.
  • Saliency analyses emphasized precordial QRS and T-wave territories; model performance was consistent across congenital lesion subtypes and paced rhythms.

Clinical Implications

AI-ECG could prioritize echocardiography, enable remote surveillance, and support earlier intervention in congenital heart disease populations at risk for LVSD.

Why It Matters

Provides an inexpensive, scalable screening and surveillance tool for LV dysfunction across diverse congenital heart lesions with strong external validation and prognostic value.

Limitations

  • Observational model development without randomized clinical utility testing
  • Lesion-specific biases and site-level acquisition differences may affect generalizability

Future Directions

Prospective impact trials to test AI-ECG–guided care pathways, integration into remote monitoring, and calibration across devices and congenital lesion subgroups.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Diagnosis/Prognosis
Evidence Level
II - Large, multicentre observational cohorts with external validation
Study Design
OTHER