New Threshold for Defining Mild Aortic Stenosis Derived From Velocity-Encoded MRI in 60,000 Individuals.
Summary
Using velocity-encoded CMR and deep learning in 62,902 participants, the authors derived population reference ranges for aortic valve hemodynamics and identified a “mild AS” threshold (>95th percentile) that separates normal from abnormal function. This threshold was prognostically adverse and externally validated in 365,870 people from NEDA, supporting a data-driven redefinition of mild AS.
Key Findings
- Deep learning quantified AV area, peak velocity, and mean gradient from velocity‑encoded CMR in 62,902 UK Biobank participants.
- A natural boundary (>95th percentile) in AV hemodynamics was defined as ‘mild AS’ and associated with adverse outcomes.
- External validation in 365,870 individuals from NEDA confirmed prognostic relevance and generalizability.
Clinical Implications
Clinicians may consider earlier surveillance for patients exceeding the data-driven ‘mild AS’ thresholds and integrate AI-derived CMR or validated echo surrogates into risk stratification, while awaiting guideline updates.
Why It Matters
This work proposes a robust, externally validated, population-based threshold for mild AS with prognostic value, potentially reshaping screening, follow-up, and clinical definitions.
Limitations
- Observational design with potential residual confounding
- CMR-based thresholds may require translation and calibration to echocardiography in routine care
Future Directions
Prospective validation of risk-guided surveillance based on the new thresholds, harmonization with echocardiographic parameters, and assessment of intervention timing.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Cohort
- Research Domain
- Diagnosis/Prognosis
- Evidence Level
- II - Large observational cohorts with external validation provide strong associative evidence.
- Study Design
- OTHER