Skip to main content

New Threshold for Defining Mild Aortic Stenosis Derived From Velocity-Encoded MRI in 60,000 Individuals.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology2025-04-03PubMed
Total: 87.5Innovation: 9Impact: 9Rigor: 8Citation: 10

Summary

Using velocity-encoded CMR and deep learning in 62,902 participants, the authors derived population reference ranges for aortic valve hemodynamics and identified a “mild AS” threshold (>95th percentile) that separates normal from abnormal function. This threshold was prognostically adverse and externally validated in 365,870 people from NEDA, supporting a data-driven redefinition of mild AS.

Key Findings

  • Deep learning quantified AV area, peak velocity, and mean gradient from velocity‑encoded CMR in 62,902 UK Biobank participants.
  • A natural boundary (>95th percentile) in AV hemodynamics was defined as ‘mild AS’ and associated with adverse outcomes.
  • External validation in 365,870 individuals from NEDA confirmed prognostic relevance and generalizability.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians may consider earlier surveillance for patients exceeding the data-driven ‘mild AS’ thresholds and integrate AI-derived CMR or validated echo surrogates into risk stratification, while awaiting guideline updates.

Why It Matters

This work proposes a robust, externally validated, population-based threshold for mild AS with prognostic value, potentially reshaping screening, follow-up, and clinical definitions.

Limitations

  • Observational design with potential residual confounding
  • CMR-based thresholds may require translation and calibration to echocardiography in routine care

Future Directions

Prospective validation of risk-guided surveillance based on the new thresholds, harmonization with echocardiographic parameters, and assessment of intervention timing.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Diagnosis/Prognosis
Evidence Level
II - Large observational cohorts with external validation provide strong associative evidence.
Study Design
OTHER