Skip to main content

Daily Cosmetic Research Analysis

3 papers

Three impactful cosmetic-dermatology studies stood out today: a large psychometric validation confirming convergent validity for key FACE-Q Aesthetics scales, a double-blind half-face clinical study showing that an ascorbyl glucoside–arginine complex improves solar lentigos over 24 weeks, and a retrospective cohort demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a 730-nm picosecond laser for ABNOM in Chinese patients. Together, they advance outcome measurement, pigmentation therapy, and device-based tr

Summary

Three impactful cosmetic-dermatology studies stood out today: a large psychometric validation confirming convergent validity for key FACE-Q Aesthetics scales, a double-blind half-face clinical study showing that an ascorbyl glucoside–arginine complex improves solar lentigos over 24 weeks, and a retrospective cohort demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a 730-nm picosecond laser for ABNOM in Chinese patients. Together, they advance outcome measurement, pigmentation therapy, and device-based treatment safety.

Research Themes

  • Patient-reported outcome measures in aesthetic medicine
  • Clinical treatment of hyperpigmentation
  • Laser/device safety and efficacy in darker skin types

Selected Articles

1. Establishing Convergent Validity of the FACE-Q Aesthetics Module Scales.

69.5Level IIICohortAesthetic surgery journal · 2025PMID: 39774767

In an online international cohort (n=1259), multiple FACE-Q Aesthetics appearance scales showed adequate convergent validity against MERZ patient-reported scales, whereas Face Overall and Cheeks did not. This supports the use of specific FACE-Q scales for evaluating outcomes of minimally invasive facial aesthetic treatments.

Impact: Validated patient-reported outcome measures underpin robust trials and comparative effectiveness research in aesthetics. These findings guide instrument selection and interpretation.

Clinical Implications: Use FACE-Q appearance scales with demonstrated convergent validity (e.g., lines, lower face/jawline, lips) for outcome assessment after minimally invasive facial procedures; interpret Face Overall and Cheeks scales with caution or seek additional validation.

Key Findings

  • Online international sample of 1,259 adults undergoing minimally invasive facial aesthetics completed 11 FACE-Q and 12 MERZ scales.
  • FACE-Q scales for lines (multiple facial regions), lower face/jawline, and lips showed adequate convergent validity with MERZ patient-reported scales.
  • FACE-Q Face Overall and Cheeks did not reach predefined thresholds for convergent validity.

Methodological Strengths

  • Large, international sample with a priori hypotheses for correlations
  • Blinded, predefined thresholds for convergent validity against a comparator instrument

Limitations

  • Online, self-selected cohort may introduce selection bias
  • Cross-sectional design without clinical outcomes or longitudinal responsiveness

Future Directions: Prospective studies assessing responsiveness, minimal clinically important differences, and validation versus clinician/observer-rated outcomes across diverse populations.

2. Treatment with Ascorbyl Glucoside-Arginine Complex Ameliorates Solar Lentigos.

65.5Level IIRCTInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024PMID: 39769217

In a double-blind half-face study of 27 Japanese women with solar lentigos, twice-daily application of a 28% AGAC lotion significantly improved pigmentation scores, increased lightness, and decreased melanin index at 12 and 24 weeks versus baseline and placebo. No hypopigmentation or safety issues were observed.

Impact: Provides controlled clinical evidence for a novel depigmenting complex in solar lentigos, a common cosmetic concern, with measurable benefits over 24 weeks.

Clinical Implications: AGAC may be considered as a non-hydroquinone option for solar lentigos, with objective improvements and a favorable safety profile; clinicians should confirm efficacy across skin types and combine with photoprotection.

Key Findings

  • Double-blind half-face design with twice-daily application for 24 weeks in 27 Japanese women with solar lentigos.
  • Significant reductions in pigmentation scores and melanin index and increases in lightness at 12 and 24 weeks versus baseline and placebo.
  • No hypopigmentation or skin adverse events observed during the study.

Methodological Strengths

  • Double-blind, within-subject half-face control design
  • Objective instrumental measurements (colorimeter, Mexameter) over 24 weeks

Limitations

  • Small sample size and single-ethnicity (Japanese females)
  • Single concentration/formulation; histologic mechanisms not assessed

Future Directions: Larger multicenter RCTs across Fitzpatrick skin types, head-to-head comparisons with standard agents (e.g., hydroquinone), and mechanistic/biopsy studies.

3. Efficacy and Safety of 730-nm Picosecond Laser for the Treatment of Acquired Bilateral Nevus of Ota-like Macules.

59Level IIICohortDermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2025PMID: 39773863

In 72 Chinese patients with ABNOM (Fitzpatrick III–IV), a 730-nm picosecond laser achieved a 75% overall effectiveness after an average of 2.4 sessions, with progressive improvement across sessions, no hypopigmentation, and a 5.6% PIH rate. Blinded photo assessments support safety and efficacy in darker skin types.

Impact: Supports the use of a specific picosecond wavelength for ABNOM in Fitzpatrick III–IV skin with low dyspigmentation risk, informing device selection and counseling.

Clinical Implications: The 730-nm picosecond laser can be considered for ABNOM in darker skin types with careful parameter selection; monitor for PIH (~5.6%) and plan for multiple sessions.

Key Findings

  • Retrospective cohort of 72 Chinese patients (Fitzpatrick III–IV) treated with a 730-nm picosecond laser for ABNOM.
  • Overall effectiveness rate was 75% after an average of 2.42 ± 0.75 sessions; progressive improvement across three sessions (p < .01).
  • No hypopigmentation observed; postinflammatory hyperpigmentation occurred in 5.56%.

Methodological Strengths

  • Blinded dermatologist assessments of high-resolution photographs using a standardized improvement scale
  • Subgroup analysis demonstrating session-wise incremental benefit

Limitations

  • Retrospective single-center design without a comparator group
  • Population limited to Chinese patients; follow-up duration not detailed

Future Directions: Prospective controlled studies comparing wavelengths/devices, parameter optimization, and longer-term recurrence and dyspigmentation outcomes across skin types.