Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Cosmetic Research Analysis

10/23/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Today's most impactful studies in aesthetic medicine span perioperative risk, scar optimization, and minimally invasive therapy for vascular anomalies. A large cohort links any nicotine exposure (including e‑cigarettes and NRT) to markedly higher wound complications after cosmetic surgery; a prospective split‑scar study identifies polydioxanone as superior for long‑term scar aesthetics versus polyester or polyglactin; and a PRISMA‑guided systematic review supports bleomycin electrosclerotherapy

Summary

Today's most impactful studies in aesthetic medicine span perioperative risk, scar optimization, and minimally invasive therapy for vascular anomalies. A large cohort links any nicotine exposure (including e‑cigarettes and NRT) to markedly higher wound complications after cosmetic surgery; a prospective split‑scar study identifies polydioxanone as superior for long‑term scar aesthetics versus polyester or polyglactin; and a PRISMA‑guided systematic review supports bleomycin electrosclerotherapy (B)EST as a promising option for venous/lymphatic malformations and vascular tumors, with manageable safety signals.

Research Themes

  • Perioperative risk modification in aesthetic surgery
  • Scar optimization via suture selection and tension control
  • Minimally invasive therapy for vascular anomalies (electrosclerotherapy)

Selected Articles

1. The Scar-suppressing Efficiency of Three Sutures with Different Degradation Rates: A Prospective Split-Scar Study.

74Level IICohort
Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025PMID: 41128798

In a prospective, randomized split-scar design, polydioxanone yielded superior 6‑month aesthetic outcomes versus polyester, while polyglactin performed worst at all time points. Parallel murine experiments suggested polyester induces greater local inflammation, offsetting benefits of tension reduction.

Impact: Identifies a practical suture choice to optimize aesthetic scarring and integrates mechanistic evidence linking suture material to inflammation.

Clinical Implications: For intradermal closures where scar aesthetics matter, prioritize polydioxanone to maintain prolonged tension reduction with lower inflammatory drive; avoid polyester for long‑term scar suppression despite initial tension maintenance.

Key Findings

  • Polyglactin had the worst scar aesthetics at 1, 3, and 6 months.
  • Polydioxanone and polyester were similar at 1–3 months, but polydioxanone was superior at 6 months.
  • Murine model showed polyester provoked enhanced local inflammation, counteracting tension-reduction benefits.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective split-scar, within-subject comparison with randomized segment assignment
  • Translational approach combining human outcomes with mechanistic murine validation

Limitations

  • Sample size and blinding procedures were not reported in the abstract
  • Single incision location; follow-up limited to 6 months; generalizability across body sites uncertain

Future Directions: Multicenter, blinded, adequately powered trials across anatomical sites with ≥12‑month follow-up and human tissue inflammatory profiling to optimize suture selection algorithms.

BACKGROUND: Our previous study demonstrated that prolonged tension reduction results in satisfactory scar suppression during modified intradermal suturing. The type of suture used in intradermal sutures is crucial for tension preservation, wherein suture degradation results in tension reduction. However, evidence revealing the optimal suture to confront local tension for a prolonged period of time is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the aesthetic outcomes associated with three sutures: polyglactin acid and polydioxanone, which are absorbable sutures with tension-maintaining times of 1 and 3 months, respectively, and the nonabsorbable suture polyester. METHODS: We evenly divided a hypogastric incision into three segments before randomly stitching them with three different sutures. After 1, 3 and 6 months, the aesthetic outcomes of the scars brought by each suture were evaluated by scar assessment scales. RESULTS: Polyglactin acid had the worst aesthetic outcome at 1, 3 and 6 months. Polydioxanone and polyester had similar aesthetic outcomes at 1 and 3 months. However, at 6 months, polyester showed unsatisfying scar inhibition compared to that of polydioxanone. To explore the underlying mechanism, we repeated the above process in mice and found enhanced inflammation in tissues stitched using polyester. The inflammation neutralized the anti-scarring efficiency of reduced tension. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that prolonged reduction in local tension plays an important role in inhibiting scarring, and the ability of sutures to induce local inflammation cannot be ignored. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

2. Nicotine Exposure (Including NRT) and Wound Complications in Plastic Surgery: Single-Institution Cohort, 1992-2024.

73Level IIICohort
Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025PMID: 41129831

Among 15,172 cosmetic surgery patients, preoperative nicotine exposure (including e‑cigarettes and NRT) was associated with markedly higher wound complications (15.2% vs 3.8%), with adjusted odds ratios 5.51–13.52 across delivery methods. Findings support perioperative counseling for complete nicotine abstinence.

Impact: Large, methodologically controlled cohort quantifies risk across all modern nicotine delivery methods, directly informing perioperative risk counseling and policy.

Clinical Implications: Implement universal preoperative nicotine screening and counsel complete abstinence irrespective of delivery method (including e‑cigarettes and NRT) before elective aesthetic procedures.

Key Findings

  • Wound complications: 15.2% in nicotine users vs 3.8% in non-users.
  • Adjusted odds ratios for complications ranged 5.51–13.52 across nicotine delivery methods.
  • Complication profiles were similar across delivery methods; direct method-to-method comparisons were not performed.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large cohort with exclusion of major clinical confounders
  • Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and procedure type; inclusion of multiple nicotine delivery methods

Limitations

  • Retrospective design with self-reported nicotine exposure; no biochemical verification
  • No head-to-head statistical comparison between delivery methods; single-institution data

Future Directions: Prospective studies with biochemical verification (e.g., cotinine), dose–response evaluation, cessation timing thresholds, and inclusion of broader comorbidity profiles to refine risk models.

BACKGROUND: Plastic-surgery guidance recommends complete preoperative abstinence from all nicotine products. We evaluated whether preoperative nicotine exposure-across delivery methods including e‑cigarettes and NRT-was associated with postoperative wound complications in cosmetic surgery. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective cohort (July 1992-February 2024). We identified adults undergoing cosmetic procedures, classifying preoperative nicotine status (single delivery method for ≥2 months) and excluding major confounders (e.g., diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, corticosteroids, antineoplastic therapy, BMI>30). Primary outcome was any wound complication. Logistic regression adjusted for age and procedure type. RESULTS: Of 15,172 patients, 1,184 (7.8%) reported nicotine use. Any complication occurred in 15.2% of nicotine users vs 3.8% of non‑users. Adjusted odds of complication were higher for nicotine users (odds ratios across delivery categories 5.51-13.52). Complication profiles were similar across delivery methods; pre-specified head-to-head comparisons among methods were not performed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative nicotine exposure is associated with substantially higher postoperative wound‑complication risk in cosmetic surgery. Signals were consistent across delivery methods, supporting perioperative counseling that emphasizes complete nicotine abstinence in elective aesthetic procedures.

3. Simply the (B)EST: what the interventionalist needs to know about (bleomycin) electrosclerotherapy for vascular anomalies.

71.5Level IIISystematic Review
European radiology · 2025PMID: 41128761

(B)EST, combining electroporation with intralesional bleomycin, yielded high response rates across 566 patients, including 65–100% complete responses in vascular tumors and up to 100% lesion/symptom reduction in malformations. Safety signals were mainly local (e.g., ulcerations, hyperpigmentation), underscoring the need for standardized protocols and long-term surveillance.

Impact: Synthesizes multi-study evidence for a relatively new, tissue-preserving intervention in difficult vascular anomalies, guiding procedural dosing and risk counseling.

Clinical Implications: Consider (B)EST for slow-flow malformations and select vascular tumors refractory to standard therapy, with counseling on local adverse effects (ulceration, hyperpigmentation) and cumulative bleomycin dose monitoring (e.g., pulmonary risk).

Key Findings

  • Across 15 studies and 566 patients, complete response in vascular tumors was 65–100%.
  • Lesion volume/symptom reduction in vascular malformations ranged 54.9–100%, mainly in slow-flow lesions.
  • Adverse events were mostly local/self-limiting (CIRSE 1a–2); ulcerations (CIRSE 3a) mainly in tumors; hyperpigmentation was frequent but often partially resolved.

Methodological Strengths

  • PRISMA-guided systematic review across multiple databases with explicit inclusion/exclusion
  • Quantitative synthesis of efficacy and adverse events with procedural dose ranges

Limitations

  • Absence of controlled trials; heterogeneity in lesion types, dosing, endpoints, and follow-up
  • Potential publication bias; limited long-term outcome data

Future Directions: Prospective, controlled comparative studies to standardize dosing, optimize electroporation parameters per VA subtype, and define long-term outcomes including cosmetic sequelae.

BACKGROUND: Vascular anomalies (VAs) require specialized multidisciplinary management. Bleomycin electrosclerotherapy (B)EST combines electroporation with intralesional bleomycin to enhance drug uptake while preserving surrounding tissue. Its role in treating VAs remains largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and procedural protocols of BEST in VA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed studies on (B)EST for VAs, excluding reviews, editorials, and animal studies. RESULTS: Among 1237 records, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, published between 2012 and 2025, primarily from Europe (13/15). A total of 566 patients were treated, including 445 with vascular malformations and 121 with vascular tumors (Kaposi sarcoma, angiosarcoma). (B)EST was mainly applied to slow-flow malformations. Across VA types, lesion-volume or symptom reduction rate was high, with five studies each reporting a 100% rate. Complete response in vascular tumors ranged from 65 to 100%. Most studies followed current guidelines, with bleomycin doses between 200 and 10,000 IU per session. Adverse effects were primarily local and self-limiting (Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe classification CIRSE 1a-2); ulcerations occurred mainly in vascular tumors (CIRSE 3a); and skin hyperpigmentation (CIRSE 1a) was observed frequently, often partially resolving over time. CONCLUSION: BEST shows promise for VA treatment, particularly venous and lymphatic malformations. While results suggest efficacy and safety, treatment heterogeneity and long-term outcomes require further investigation. Optimizing tailored protocols for each VA subtype and presentation is essential for defining (B)EST's role in VA management. KEY POINTS: Question What is the role and efficacy of (bleomycin) electrosclerotherapy (B)EST in managing vascular anomalies resistant to conventional treatments, including tumors and malformations? Findings (B)EST demonstrated significant efficacy, achieving 65-100% complete responses in vascular tumors and 54.9-100% lesion or symptom reduction in vascular malformations. Clinical relevance (B)EST offers an option for patients with treatment-resistant or recurrent vascular anomalies, improving symptom-related outcomes. This is tempered by the absence of controlled trials, the need for cumulative dose pulmonary monitoring and the potential cosmetic burden of hyperpigmentation.