Efficacy of different endodontic irrigants in the lesion sterilization and tissue repair technique in primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Summary
In a randomized trial of 40 children undergoing LSTR for primary molars, chlorhexidine yielded the best clinical outcomes and the least root resorption, while sodium hypochlorite produced the greatest reduction in furcation radiolucency. All irrigants outperformed saline, supporting irrigant use prior to alternate 3-Mix placement.
Key Findings
- All irrigant groups achieved clinical success compared with saline (P < 0.05).
- 2% chlorhexidine showed the best clinical outcomes and the least root resorption.
- 2% sodium hypochlorite produced the greatest reduction in furcation radiolucency.
- Follow-up extended to 18 months with consistent clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Clinical Implications
For pediatric LSTR, chlorhexidine may be preferred for overall clinical success and minimal root resorption, while sodium hypochlorite may be selected when radiographic lesion size reduction is prioritized.
Why It Matters
Provides comparative clinical evidence guiding irrigant choice in pediatric LSTR with 18-month follow-up, potentially standardizing protocols.
Limitations
- Single-center study with a modest sample size (n=40)
- Blinding and allocation concealment procedures are not detailed
Future Directions
Conduct larger, multicenter RCTs with standardized outcome measures and microbiological endpoints, and extend follow-up to natural exfoliation.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- II - Randomized controlled clinical trial with modest sample size and limited reporting on blinding
- Study Design
- OTHER