Skip to main content

Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Erbium YAG Laser Along With Normal Saline vs. Its Combination With Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Treatment of Striae Distensae: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology2025-01-22PubMed
Total: 71.0Innovation: 7Impact: 6Rigor: 8Citation: 6

Summary

In a double-blind split-lesion RCT (12 patients, 36 lesions), Er:YAG laser combined with SVF significantly outperformed PRP and saline in improving epidermal/dermal density and thickness measures, with the highest patient and physician satisfaction at 3 months and no significant complications. PRP also improved dermal and total density versus saline.

Key Findings

  • SVF + Er:YAG significantly increased epidermal density (45.95 to 51.19; p=0.001) and outperformed PRP and saline in multiple thickness and density metrics.
  • All groups improved in thickness indices (complete, epidermal, dermal) and R5 cutometer, indicating laser benefit; PRP exceeded saline in dermal/total density.
  • Patient and physician satisfaction were highest in the SVF group (p=0.001), with no significant post-treatment complications reported.

Clinical Implications

Consider combining SVF with Er:YAG laser for striae distensae to enhance structural and biomechanical outcomes; larger, multi-session trials are warranted to confirm durability and generalizability.

Why It Matters

Demonstrates a regenerative adjunct (SVF) that measurably augments laser outcomes for striae distensae, informing protocol design for a challenging cosmetic condition.

Limitations

  • Small sample size (12 patients) and single-session treatment limit generalizability.
  • Short follow-up (3 months) without histologic correlation or long-term durability data.

Future Directions

Larger, multi-center trials with multiple sessions, longer follow-up, standardized PROMs, and histologic endpoints to validate efficacy and durability.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Randomized, double-blind split-lesion clinical trial
Study Design
OTHER