Skip to main content

The 2024 Assisi think tank on breast cancer: Focus on the use of a tumour bed boost after breast conserving therapy.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025-01-25PubMed
Total: 69.0Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 6Citation: 8

Summary

Expert consensus synthesizing literature concludes that tumor bed boost after whole-breast irradiation halves 10-year local recurrence but worsens cosmesis and fibrosis without survival benefit. A pragmatic 3% absolute 10-year risk-reduction threshold is proposed to guide omission vs. use with shared decision-making.

Key Findings

  • Boost halves 10-year local recurrence after whole-breast irradiation.
  • No overall survival improvement with boost despite lower local recurrence.
  • Cosmetic outcomes worsen and fibrosis increases with boost.
  • Recommends omitting boost if absolute 10-year reduction is <3%; shared decision-making if >3%.
  • Calls for better boost volume precision and subgroup identification for safe omission.

Clinical Implications

Adopt a shared decision-making framework using a 3% 10-year local recurrence risk-reduction threshold to decide on boost; prioritize cosmesis in low-risk cases and refine boost volume for necessary cases.

Why It Matters

Provides actionable, patient-centered thresholds balancing oncologic control and cosmetic outcomes—likely to shape radiotherapy planning and informed consent discussions.

Limitations

  • Consensus review without new primary data; subject to publication and selection bias.
  • Heterogeneity in source studies may limit generalizability; lacks patient-level meta-analysis.

Future Directions

Prospective identification of low-risk subgroups for safe boost omission and trials testing precise boost volume delineation to mitigate cosmetic toxicity.

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
IV - Expert consensus based on a literature review; no new randomized data generated.
Study Design
OTHER