The 2024 Assisi think tank on breast cancer: Focus on the use of a tumour bed boost after breast conserving therapy.
Summary
Expert consensus synthesizing literature concludes that tumor bed boost after whole-breast irradiation halves 10-year local recurrence but worsens cosmesis and fibrosis without survival benefit. A pragmatic 3% absolute 10-year risk-reduction threshold is proposed to guide omission vs. use with shared decision-making.
Key Findings
- Boost halves 10-year local recurrence after whole-breast irradiation.
- No overall survival improvement with boost despite lower local recurrence.
- Cosmetic outcomes worsen and fibrosis increases with boost.
- Recommends omitting boost if absolute 10-year reduction is <3%; shared decision-making if >3%.
- Calls for better boost volume precision and subgroup identification for safe omission.
Clinical Implications
Adopt a shared decision-making framework using a 3% 10-year local recurrence risk-reduction threshold to decide on boost; prioritize cosmesis in low-risk cases and refine boost volume for necessary cases.
Why It Matters
Provides actionable, patient-centered thresholds balancing oncologic control and cosmetic outcomes—likely to shape radiotherapy planning and informed consent discussions.
Limitations
- Consensus review without new primary data; subject to publication and selection bias.
- Heterogeneity in source studies may limit generalizability; lacks patient-level meta-analysis.
Future Directions
Prospective identification of low-risk subgroups for safe boost omission and trials testing precise boost volume delineation to mitigate cosmetic toxicity.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Systematic Review
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- IV - Expert consensus based on a literature review; no new randomized data generated.
- Study Design
- OTHER