Chlorhexidine vs Routine Foot Washing to Prevent Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Summary
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT of 175 high-risk veterans with diabetes, daily 2% chlorhexidine wipes did not reduce time to new foot complications versus soap-and-water wipes over 1 year. The intervention was well tolerated and adherence was high, with no product-related adverse events.
Key Findings
- No significant reduction in new foot complications with chlorhexidine vs control (12/88 [14%] vs 14/87 [16%]; HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.39–1.80).
- Median time to complication was 232 days (IQR 115–315) across groups.
- High adherence (83%) and no product-related adverse events over 1 year.
Clinical Implications
Routine use of chlorhexidine wipes for diabetic foot care should not be recommended solely for preventing ulcers, infection, or amputation; reinforce standard soap-and-water hygiene and comprehensive foot self-care education.
Why It Matters
High-quality negative RCT evidence counters assumptions that antiseptic wipes prevent diabetic foot complications, informing preventive care strategies.
Limitations
- Single-center VA population limits generalizability
- Phase 2b with modest sample size may be underpowered for small effect sizes
Future Directions
Evaluate multifaceted foot-care interventions (education, offloading, footwear) and identify subgroups that might benefit from antiseptic strategies; explore pragmatic, multicenter designs.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Prevention
- Evidence Level
- I - Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
- Study Design
- OTHER