Skip to main content

Assessing the exposure to the UV filter DHHB in urine samples from the German Environmental Specimen Bank (2000-2021): Evaluating the impact of a potential impurity of di-n-hexyl phthalate in DHHB.

International journal of hygiene and environmental health2025-03-22PubMed
Total: 80.5Innovation: 9Impact: 8Rigor: 7Citation: 9

Summary

Across 250 24-h urine samples (2000–2021), specific metabolites of the UV filter DHHB (DHB, EHB) emerged from 2012 onward, indicating increasing exposure, though estimated intake remained far below a no-effect level. Retrospective dosing experiments demonstrated that di-n-hexyl phthalate (DnHexP) impurities in DHHB lead to measurable phthalate metabolite excretion, suggesting contaminated DHHB can contribute to phthalate exposure.

Key Findings

  • In 250 24-h urine samples (2000–2021), specific DHHB metabolites DHB (18%) and EHB (13%) were detected, with first appearances in 2012 and rising thereafter.
  • Estimated median daily intake was 37 ng/kg bw/d, far below the derived no-effect level of 2900 mg/kg bw/d.
  • AHB (87% detection) was not specific to DHHB, limiting its utility for exposure assessment.
  • Retrospective oral dosing revealed dose-dependent excretion of DnHexP metabolites from DHHB impurity; a rough 45% excretion fraction was derived for MnHexP.
  • Findings warrant re-assessment of DHHB cosmetic safety and surveillance of both DHHB and DnHexP in biomonitoring.

Clinical Implications

Dermatologists and public health clinicians should be aware that DHHB-containing products may introduce DnHexP exposure if contaminated; consider counseling high-risk populations and monitoring emerging guidance. Regulators and manufacturers should audit DHHB purity and surveil DnHexP metabolites in HBM programs.

Why It Matters

It identifies a plausible, underrecognized route of phthalate exposure via an impurity in a widely used sunscreen ingredient, directly informing cosmetic safety assessment and regulation.

Limitations

  • ESB samples were collected in winter, likely underestimating sunscreen-related exposure.
  • AHB lacked specificity for DHHB, complicating exposure attribution.
  • Dose allocation uncertainties limited precise excretion fraction estimates in dosing experiments.
  • Cross-sectional design cannot define individual longitudinal exposure patterns.

Future Directions

Audit DHHB supply chains for DnHexP contamination, expand HBM to summer seasons and diverse populations, establish product-level impurity thresholds, and validate specific biomarkers for DHHB exposure.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Prevention
Evidence Level
III - Well-designed observational human biomonitoring with complementary dosing experiments.
Study Design
OTHER