Assessing the exposure to the UV filter DHHB in urine samples from the German Environmental Specimen Bank (2000-2021): Evaluating the impact of a potential impurity of di-n-hexyl phthalate in DHHB.
Summary
Across 250 24-h urine samples (2000–2021), specific metabolites of the UV filter DHHB (DHB, EHB) emerged from 2012 onward, indicating increasing exposure, though estimated intake remained far below a no-effect level. Retrospective dosing experiments demonstrated that di-n-hexyl phthalate (DnHexP) impurities in DHHB lead to measurable phthalate metabolite excretion, suggesting contaminated DHHB can contribute to phthalate exposure.
Key Findings
- In 250 24-h urine samples (2000–2021), specific DHHB metabolites DHB (18%) and EHB (13%) were detected, with first appearances in 2012 and rising thereafter.
- Estimated median daily intake was 37 ng/kg bw/d, far below the derived no-effect level of 2900 mg/kg bw/d.
- AHB (87% detection) was not specific to DHHB, limiting its utility for exposure assessment.
- Retrospective oral dosing revealed dose-dependent excretion of DnHexP metabolites from DHHB impurity; a rough 45% excretion fraction was derived for MnHexP.
- Findings warrant re-assessment of DHHB cosmetic safety and surveillance of both DHHB and DnHexP in biomonitoring.
Clinical Implications
Dermatologists and public health clinicians should be aware that DHHB-containing products may introduce DnHexP exposure if contaminated; consider counseling high-risk populations and monitoring emerging guidance. Regulators and manufacturers should audit DHHB purity and surveil DnHexP metabolites in HBM programs.
Why It Matters
It identifies a plausible, underrecognized route of phthalate exposure via an impurity in a widely used sunscreen ingredient, directly informing cosmetic safety assessment and regulation.
Limitations
- ESB samples were collected in winter, likely underestimating sunscreen-related exposure.
- AHB lacked specificity for DHHB, complicating exposure attribution.
- Dose allocation uncertainties limited precise excretion fraction estimates in dosing experiments.
- Cross-sectional design cannot define individual longitudinal exposure patterns.
Future Directions
Audit DHHB supply chains for DnHexP contamination, expand HBM to summer seasons and diverse populations, establish product-level impurity thresholds, and validate specific biomarkers for DHHB exposure.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Cohort
- Research Domain
- Prevention
- Evidence Level
- III - Well-designed observational human biomonitoring with complementary dosing experiments.
- Study Design
- OTHER