Skip to main content

Consensus Statements on Managing Aesthetic Needs in Prescription Medication-Driven Weight Loss Patients: An International, Multidisciplinary Delphi Study.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology2025-03-26PubMed
Total: 70.5Innovation: 8Impact: 7Rigor: 6Citation: 8

Summary

Through a three-round international Delphi process grounded in interviews, market research, and a literature review, experts defined medication-driven weight loss (mdWL), identified affected facial tissue layers (skin; superficial/deep fat), and recommended 3D volumetric analysis plus PROMs for assessment. The consensus outlines sequencing and timing of non-surgical treatments and highlights patient/physician concerns to guide aesthetic care in the GLP-1 era.

Key Findings

  • mdWL best defined by the percentage of BMI lost within ≤6 months.
  • 3D volumetric analysis is recommended for quantitative assessment; photo-numeric scales and PROMs for qualitative assessment.
  • mdWL primarily affects skin and both superficial and deep facial fat pads.
  • Consensus details selection and timing of non-surgical treatments across the mdWL journey and addresses patient/physician concerns.

Clinical Implications

Adopt 3D volumetric analysis and PROMs for mdWL assessment; prioritize skin and fat pad changes; plan treatment sequencing to avoid an appearance of weight regain while maintaining natural, healthy outcomes.

Why It Matters

This is the first global consensus addressing the rapidly expanding mdWL population, providing practical, multidisciplinary algorithms likely to shape aesthetic assessment and treatment sequencing.

Limitations

  • Consensus-based guidance lacks randomized comparative evidence.
  • Panel size and voting thresholds not specified in the abstract; external validity may vary by practice setting.

Future Directions

Prospective validation of proposed assessment tools and treatment sequencing, and head-to-head studies of aesthetic interventions stratified by mdWL trajectory and tissue changes.

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
V - Expert consensus (Delphi) informed by interviews, market research, and a literature review.
Study Design
OTHER