Skip to main content

Ultrasound-Guided Gluteal Fat Grafting: What is the Evidence? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aesthetic surgery journal2025-04-09PubMed
Total: 73.0Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 7Citation: 8

Summary

Across 6,235 patients, ultrasound-guided gluteal fat grafting demonstrated no reported mortality or fat embolism and low rates of minor complications. These findings support ultrasound guidance as a safer technique that aligns with recommendations to avoid intramuscular injection.

Key Findings

  • No reported mortality or fat embolism across 6,235 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided gluteal fat grafting
  • Low pooled minor complication rate (6.32 per 100), including seroma (2.94/100), infection (0.23/100), and fat necrosis (0.09/100)
  • Use of Freeman–Tukey transformation and R-based meta-analysis with low heterogeneity (I² = 0 for fat necrosis)

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should adopt ultrasound guidance for gluteal fat grafting, emphasize subcutaneous-only injections, and integrate training/credentialing to reduce catastrophic complications.

Why It Matters

Addresses an urgent safety issue in a high-demand cosmetic procedure by quantifying serious adverse events and minor complication rates with ultrasound guidance.

Limitations

  • Only four studies included and all patients were female, limiting generalizability
  • Observational evidence with potential underreporting and lack of long-term follow-up

Future Directions

Prospective registries and standardized ultrasound protocols with competency benchmarks; assessment of long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing procedural safety
Study Design
OTHER