Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Chin Augmentation Using MaiLi-E, a Lidocaine-Containing Cross-Linked Sodium Hyaluronate Gel.

Aesthetic plastic surgery2025-04-22PubMed
Total: 79.5Innovation: 7Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

In a multicenter randomized, evaluator-blinded, delayed-treatment controlled trial (n=159), MaiLi‑E significantly improved chin retrusion at 6 months (64.2% responders vs 20.8% control; P<0.0001), with high participant-rated aesthetic improvement (91.5%) and durability to 12 months. Adverse events occurred in 64.8% overall, but treatment-related AEs were low (5.0%).

Key Findings

  • Responder rate at 6 months: 64.2% (MaiLi‑E) vs 20.8% (control), P<0.0001
  • Participant Global Aesthetic Improvement: 91.5% (MaiLi‑E) vs 0.0% (control)
  • Efficacy maintained in most participants at 12 months
  • Adverse events in 64.8% overall; treatment-related AEs in 5.0%

Clinical Implications

Supports MaiLi‑E as an effective option for mild-to-severe chin retrusion with benefits lasting up to 12 months; informs patient counseling, follow-up scheduling, and risk–benefit discussions based on blinded outcomes and AE rates.

Why It Matters

This CONSORT-like randomized evidence directly informs efficacy, durability, and safety of a new hyaluronic acid filler for chin augmentation. It fills a clinical evidence gap in aesthetic injectables with blinded evaluation and a delayed-treatment control.

Limitations

  • No active comparator against other fillers; generalizability limited to chin retrusion
  • Patient blinding not described; long-term safety beyond 12 months not assessed

Future Directions

Head-to-head trials versus other HA fillers, inclusion of diverse populations, standardized patient-reported outcomes, and longer-term safety surveillance.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Randomized controlled trial with blinded evaluators and control arm
Study Design
OTHER