Skip to main content

Prospective Phase II Multicenter Trial of Ablation after Breast Lumpectomy Added To Extend (ABLATE) Intraoperative Margins for the Sole Local Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Annals of surgical oncology2026-01-19PubMed
Total: 77.5Innovation: 8Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

Among 242 patients (median follow-up 44 months), eRFA after lumpectomy achieved an in-breast recurrence rate of 2.9% with re-excision <5% and good/excellent cosmesis in 89%. Pain at 6 months was markedly lower with eRFA alone versus eRFA+XRT (1.7% vs 19%), suggesting eRFA can safely replace whole-breast irradiation for selected patients.

Key Findings

  • N=242; median follow-up 44 months (12–96)
  • In-breast recurrence rate 2.9%; re-excision for positive margins <5%
  • Good/excellent cosmesis in 89% by RTOG scales
  • Breast pain at 6 months: 1.7% with eRFA alone vs 19% with eRFA+XRT (p<0.05)
  • Majority avoided whole-breast radiation and mastectomy

Clinical Implications

For selected ER+PR+HER2− or DCIS tumors ≤3 cm with negative nodes, eRFA can be considered to extend margins intraoperatively and avoid whole-breast irradiation, reducing treatment burden and pain while maintaining excellent cosmesis.

Why It Matters

Demonstrates a practical, single-setting intraoperative alternative to adjuvant radiation with favorable local control and cosmesis, potentially improving access, adherence, and quality of life.

Limitations

  • Single-arm study without randomized comparator to standard XRT
  • Selection bias and generalizability require confirmation in controlled trials

Future Directions

Randomized trials comparing eRFA versus standard whole-breast irradiation, longer-term oncologic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
III - Prospective, multicenter, single-arm Phase II therapeutic study
Study Design
OTHER