Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of a Poly-L-Lactic Acid Filler for Temporal Augmentation: A Randomized, No-treatment Control, Evaluator-blinded, Multicenter Study.

Aesthetic surgery journal2026-02-04PubMed
Total: 84.0Innovation: 8Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

In a multicenter randomized, evaluator-blinded trial (n=174), PLLA injections produced robust improvement in temple hollowing, with 96.5% achieving ≥1-grade ATHS improvement at 6 months versus 0% in controls. Gains across GAIS, 3D volumetry, and satisfaction persisted to 12 months, with no therapy-related adverse events observed.

Key Findings

  • At month 6, 96.5% of treated participants achieved ≥1-grade ATHS improvement vs 0% in controls (P < 0.0001).
  • Consistent improvements across GAIS and 3D-measured temporal volume persisted through 12 months.
  • No therapy-related adverse events were reported; PLLA was well tolerated.

Clinical Implications

PLLA offers a minimally invasive, durable option for temple hollowing with high patient satisfaction. It can be considered as an alternative to hyaluronic acid or fat grafting, while head-to-head comparative and longer-term (>12 months) data are still needed.

Why It Matters

This is rigorous randomized evidence for PLLA in temporal augmentation, addressing a common aesthetic indication with durable benefit and an excellent safety profile.

Limitations

  • No active comparator (e.g., hyaluronic acid or fat grafting); control was no-treatment
  • Follow-up limited to 12 months; long-term durability beyond one year is unknown

Future Directions

Head-to-head trials versus hyaluronic acid and fat grafting, optimization of injection protocols, and longer-term (>24 months) outcomes including late adverse events.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Randomized, evaluator-blinded, multicenter clinical trial with a control group
Study Design
OTHER