Evaluation of oncologic safety and clinical effectiveness of immediate autologous fat grafting in breast-conserving surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial for breast cancer.
Summary
In 360 randomized patients undergoing BCS, immediate autologous fat grafting did not increase locoregional (0.6% vs 2.4%; P=0.65) or distant recurrence (3.6% vs 3.5%) nor disease-specific mortality (0.6% vs 0.6%). Patient-reported satisfaction with breast appearance, psychosocial, and sexual well-being were significantly higher with IAFG.
Key Findings
- No increase in local relapse with IAFG vs control (0.6% vs 2.4%; P=0.65).
- No difference in distant recurrence (3.6% vs 3.5%) or breast cancer-specific mortality (0.6% vs 0.6%).
- Higher patient-reported satisfaction (78 vs 65; P<0.001), psychosocial well-being (83 vs 71; P<0.001), and sexual well-being (74 vs 66; P<0.001) with IAFG.
Clinical Implications
IAFG can be offered at the time of BCS to optimize cosmetic outcomes without compromising oncologic safety, with counseling on expected improvements in satisfaction and well-being.
Why It Matters
This multicenter RCT directly addresses longstanding oncologic safety concerns of fat grafting near the tumor bed and demonstrates clear quality-of-life benefits.
Limitations
- Blinding to surgical intervention is not feasible, potentially influencing subjective outcomes.
- Technique and graft volume variability may affect generalizability; very long-term safety beyond ~7 years remains to be established.
Future Directions
Standardize grafting protocols and imaging surveillance; extend follow-up; compare IAFG with alternative oncoplastic techniques in diverse populations.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Multicenter randomized controlled trial with long follow-up assessing recurrence and PROs after BCS±IAFG.
- Study Design
- OTHER