Skip to main content

Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis from 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Adhesives.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons2026-03-06PubMed
Total: 77.0Rigor: 8Innovation: 7Journal: 8Clinical: 8

Summary

This PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis (74 studies; 25,442 patients meta-analyzed) estimates a 4% pooled incidence of allergic contact dermatitis to 2-octyl cyanoacrylate with substantial heterogeneity. Re-exposure dramatically increases risk (>20% in several cohorts), and rates are higher in plastic surgery than orthopedic cohorts; prior adhesive/contact allergy and cosmetic acrylate exposure are strong risk factors.

Key Findings

  • Pooled ACD incidence after 2-OCA exposure was 4% (95% CI 3–5%) with high heterogeneity (I²=94.5%).
  • Incidence varied by specialty: 8% in plastic surgery vs 4% in orthopedics (p=0.015 for subgroup differences).
  • Re-exposure increased postoperative reactions to >20% in several cohorts.
  • Prior adhesive/contact allergy and cosmetic acrylate exposure were strong risk factors.

Clinical Implications

Implement preoperative screening for prior adhesive/contact allergy and cosmetic acrylate exposure, avoid re-exposure when feasible, consider alternative closure methods in high-risk patients, and use selective patch testing to confirm diagnosis when needed.

Why It Matters

Quantifies the incidence and risk modifiers of an increasingly recognized surgical adhesive complication across specialties, directly informing perioperative risk assessment and material choice.

Limitations

  • Substantial heterogeneity (I²=94.5%) across studies.
  • Diagnosis often based on clinical assessment with selective patch testing; variable criteria across reports.
  • Many included studies were observational or case-based, increasing residual confounding and potential publication bias.

Future Directions

Prospective cohorts and trials with standardized diagnostic criteria and patch testing to refine risk estimates; development of hypoallergenic adhesive formulations; decision tools for repeat procedures.

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Prevention
Evidence Level
II - PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized, observational, and case-based evidence.
Study Design
OTHER