Skip to main content

Fracture liaison service (FLS) is associated with lower subsequent fragility fracture risk and mortality: NoFRACT (the Norwegian capture the fracture initiative).

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025-01-14PubMed
Total: 82.5Innovation: 7Impact: 9Rigor: 9Citation: 8

Summary

In a nationwide, register-supported stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial including 100,198 fracture patients, implementation of an FLS program reduced subsequent fragility fractures (HR 0.87 in women; 0.90 in men) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.82 in women; 0.85 in men) over up to 4.7 years. These findings support FLS as an effective secondary prevention strategy.

Key Findings

  • FLS reduced subsequent fragility fracture risk by 13% in women (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.92) and 10% in men (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81–0.99).
  • FLS reduced all-cause mortality by 18% in women (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.79–0.86) and 15% in men (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81–0.89).
  • Stepped-wedge cluster implementation across three clusters over 2015–2018 enabled pragmatic evaluation within routine care using national registry data.

Clinical Implications

Health systems should implement standardized FLS pathways for patients ≥50 years after low-energy fractures to reduce secondary fractures and mortality, integrating osteoporosis assessment and treatment with registry tracking.

Why It Matters

Demonstrates real-world effectiveness of a scalable service model that lowers both fracture recurrence and mortality at population scale. Provides high-grade evidence to guide health system adoption of FLS.

Limitations

  • Potential residual confounding and misclassification inherent to registry data
  • Stepped-wedge design susceptible to temporal trends despite adjustment

Future Directions

Assess cost-effectiveness, implementation fidelity, and equity of FLS at scale; evaluate optimization of pharmacotherapy (e.g., denosumab vs bisphosphonates) within FLS pathways.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Prevention
Evidence Level
I - Cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial providing high-level causal inference in real-world settings
Study Design
OTHER