Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity.
Summary
An international Commission redefines obesity by introducing “clinical obesity” as a chronic illness due to organ/tissue dysfunction from excess adiposity and distinguishes it from “preclinical obesity.” It proposes objective diagnostic criteria that move beyond BMI alone, incorporating adiposity distribution and functional impairment.
Key Findings
- Defines clinical obesity as a chronic systemic illness due to organ/tissue dysfunction from excess adiposity.
- Differentiates preclinical obesity (excess adiposity without dysfunction) from clinical obesity (with dysfunction).
- Establishes objective diagnostic criteria beyond BMI, informed by a 58-member multidisciplinary, international panel including people with lived experience.
Clinical Implications
Clinicians should assess adiposity distribution and organ dysfunction (e.g., cardiometabolic, renal, hepatic, musculoskeletal) to distinguish preclinical vs clinical obesity and guide treatment intensity beyond BMI thresholds.
Why It Matters
This work challenges BMI-centric diagnosis and offers a field-wide framework likely to influence clinical guidelines, coding, and therapeutic prioritization.
Limitations
- Consensus-based framework requires prospective validation and operationalization in clinical pathways
- Potential implementation variability across health systems and risk of misclassification without standardized tools
Future Directions
Develop and validate clinical tools and biomarkers integrating organ dysfunction metrics; test health and economic outcomes when applying the new criteria across diverse populations.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Systematic Review
- Research Domain
- Diagnosis
- Evidence Level
- V - Expert consensus/commission report synthesizing evidence and proposing diagnostic criteria
- Study Design
- OTHER