Skip to main content

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in people with intellectual disabilities: Examining incidence, risk factors, quality of care and related complications. A population-based matched cohort study.

Diabetes research and clinical practice2025-03-09PubMed
Total: 77.0Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 8Citation: 8

Summary

In a nationwide matched cohort (n≈495,869), people with intellectual disabilities had a markedly higher adjusted incidence of type 2 diabetes (IRR 6.91), with impaired mobility a strong risk factor (OR 7.72). They received fewer recommended tests and had a 12% higher risk of macrovascular complications, underscoring care inequities.

Key Findings

  • Adjusted incidence rate ratio for T2DM was 6.91 (95% CI 5.81–8.22) in people with intellectual disabilities versus matched controls.
  • Impaired mobility strongly associated with incident T2DM (OR 7.72, 95% CI 5.87–10.15).
  • Lower receipt of HbA1c/cholesterol tests and eye/foot exams; 12% higher risk of macrovascular complications.

Clinical Implications

Implement earlier and more intensive T2DM screening and risk management in people with intellectual disabilities, address mobility-related risks, and ensure equitable delivery of HbA1c/lipid testing and retinopathy/foot examinations to reduce macrovascular complications.

Why It Matters

This study quantifies substantial diabetes risk and care deficits in a large, underserved population, providing targets for policy and tailored clinical interventions.

Limitations

  • Observational design may have residual confounding and misclassification in EHR coding.
  • Follow-up intensity and health care access variability could bias detection of outcomes.

Future Directions

Test targeted screening/care pathways in randomized or quasi-experimental designs for people with intellectual disabilities; evaluate mobility-focused interventions to reduce T2DM risk and complications.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Prevention/Prognosis
Evidence Level
II - Large, population-based matched observational cohort with multivariable adjustment.
Study Design
OTHER