Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Phosphate-Lowering Agents for Adult Patients with CKD Requiring Dialysis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2025-03-14PubMed
Total: 79.5Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 9Citation: 7

Summary

Across 70 RCTs in 15,551 dialysis patients, sevelamer reduced all-cause mortality versus calcium-based binders. Lanthanum and sucroferric oxyhydroxide slowed coronary artery calcium progression, while nicotinamide and sucroferric oxyhydroxide had higher gastrointestinal adverse events.

Key Findings

  • Sevelamer reduced all-cause mortality versus calcium-based agents (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.94).
  • Lanthanum and sucroferric oxyhydroxide slowed CACS progression vs calcium-based agents (SMD −0.26 and −0.50, respectively).
  • GI events were highest with nicotinamide, followed by sucroferric oxyhydroxide.
  • Calcium-based agents increased serum calcium and reduced iPTH compared with other agents; bicarbonate levels were higher with most agents except sevelamer.

Clinical Implications

Prefer sevelamer over calcium-based binders when mortality reduction is prioritized; consider lanthanum or sucroferric oxyhydroxide to slow coronary calcification while balancing GI tolerability. Tenapanor may be favorable for mortality ranking but requires individual risk–benefit assessment.

Why It Matters

This synthesis provides comparative effectiveness and safety signals across all major phosphate-lowering agents, including mortality differences, informing CKD-MBD treatment choices.

Limitations

  • Indirect comparisons and heterogeneity across trials and treatment durations (≥8 weeks).
  • Adverse event reporting and outcomes varied between studies; potential publication bias cannot be fully excluded.

Future Directions

Head-to-head pragmatic trials and patient-level network meta-analyses are needed to validate mortality and calcification findings and to clarify GI tolerability trade-offs.

Study Information

Study Type
Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Network meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials provides high-level comparative evidence.
Study Design
OTHER