From "Burnt-Out" to "Burning-Out": Capturing Liver Fat Loss in Patients With Advanced Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease From a Dynamic Perspective.
Summary
In a 16-center cohort (n=3273 histology; n=5455 serial VCTE), ‘burnt-out’ MASLD (≤S1 steatosis, ≥F3 fibrosis) carried significantly higher risks of mortality, liver-related events, and decompensation. Trajectory-defined ‘burning-out’ MASLD, with progressive CAP decline and LSM rise, also showed elevated adverse outcome rates, underscoring that fat loss in advanced disease signals worse prognosis.
Key Findings
- Defined ‘burnt-out’ MASLD (≤S1 steatosis, ≥F3 fibrosis) in 435/3273 histology cases with higher mortality (HR 2.14), LREs (HR 1.77), and decompensation (HR 1.83).
- Identified 176 ‘burning-out’ patients via trajectory analysis (falling CAP, rising LSM) with elevated incidence of adverse outcomes.
- Burning-out group had higher cumulative incidence of events than patients with consistently high CAP and lower LSM (P < .0001).
Clinical Implications
Patients with advanced MASLD and low/declining steatosis merit aggressive surveillance for decompensation and liver-related events; dynamic CAP/LSM trajectories can refine prognosis and therapeutic prioritization.
Why It Matters
Establishes a dynamic steatosis-loss phenotype (‘burning-out’) linked to adverse outcomes, challenging reliance on steatosis as a benign sign in advanced MASLD and informing risk stratification.
Limitations
- Observational design susceptible to residual confounding.
- Definitions rely on CAP/LSM thresholds which may vary by device/setting.
Future Directions
Prospective validation of burning-out trajectories across platforms and integration into risk models; evaluate whether targeted antifibrotic or metabolic therapies alter burning-out course.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Cohort
- Research Domain
- Prognosis
- Evidence Level
- II - Large multicenter cohort with histology and longitudinal imaging to assess prognosis.
- Study Design
- OTHER