Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in People With Type 2 Diabetes, According to SGLT2i Use: Prespecified Analyses of the SOUL Randomized Trial.
Summary
In SOUL, oral semaglutide reduced MACE by 14% overall (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.96). Benefits were consistent among participants with or without SGLT2 inhibitor therapy at baseline or during follow-up, and serious adverse events were similar, supporting the safety of combination therapy.
Key Findings
- Overall MACE reduction with oral semaglutide vs placebo: HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.96).
- Effect estimates were similar with baseline SGLT2i use (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.71–1.11) and without (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95); no signal of harm with combination.
- Serious adverse events were comparable between groups, supporting safety of co-administration.
Clinical Implications
For T2D with ASCVD/CKD, oral semaglutide can be added to SGLT2i without compromising safety and with preserved CV benefit. Consider combination therapy to maximize cardiorenal protection.
Why It Matters
Addresses the clinical question of combining GLP-1RA with SGLT2i, showing route-agnostic CV benefit and safety of oral semaglutide regardless of SGLT2i use. This informs real-world optimization of cardioprotective regimens.
Limitations
- Subgroup analyses may be underpowered; confidence intervals in SGLT2i users crossed 1.0.
- Not designed to detect interaction effects definitively; background therapies may vary over time.
Future Directions
Direct randomized trials testing combination therapy strategies (GLP-1RA plus SGLT2i) with renal and HF endpoints; mechanistic studies to delineate additive vs. independent pathways.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Treatment/Prevention
- Evidence Level
- II - Prespecified subgroup analyses within an RCT
- Study Design
- OTHER