A clinical algorithm to identify people with the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase p.Val68Met variant at risk for diabetes undertreatment.
Summary
Using routine glucose, HbA1c, and RDW from a single draw, the authors trained and externally validated algorithms to flag individuals with the G6PD p.Val68Met variant whose HbA1c may be systematically underestimated. Among people with diabetes, those predicted as possibly deficient had 1.4-fold higher 20-year diabetic retinopathy rates, supporting the clinical relevance of identifying at-risk individuals for genotype testing and glucose-based monitoring.
Key Findings
- Algorithm trained on 122,307 Black participants using concurrent glucose, HbA1c, and RDW predicted G6PD p.Val68Met deficiency risk.
- In hemizygous males, precision/recall were 31%/81% (possible) and 81%/10% (likely); in homozygous females, 6%/76% and 34%/13%, respectively.
- Predicted possible deficiency in diabetes was associated with a 1.4-fold higher 20-year retinopathy rate (14.3% vs 11.2%).
- External validation across All of Us, BioVU, and MVP supports generalizability.
Clinical Implications
Health systems can deploy this algorithm to identify patients who may benefit from G6PD genotyping and a shift toward glucose-based monitoring and treatment targets, reducing the risk of undertreatment and complications such as retinopathy.
Why It Matters
This work operationalizes precision diagnostics using widely available labs to mitigate HbA1c bias, addressing an equity gap in diabetes care for populations with higher G6PD variant prevalence.
Limitations
- Lower precision in females and trade-offs between possible vs likely deficiency thresholds
- Focus on p.Val68Met and self-identified Black cohorts may limit ancestry generalizability; prospective clinical impact not yet tested
Future Directions
Prospective implementation trials should assess workflow integration, impact on treatment decisions and outcomes, and extension to other G6PD variants and ancestries.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Cohort
- Research Domain
- Diagnosis
- Evidence Level
- II - Large observational multicohort development and external validation with clinical outcomes association
- Study Design
- OTHER