Skip to main content

NH600001, an etomidate analogue, provides gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation/anesthesia and reduces adrenocortical depression: two randomized controlled trials.

Nature communications2026-05-06PubMed
Total: 85.5Rigor: 9Innovation: 8Journal: 9Clinical: 8

Summary

Across two double-blind multicenter RCTs (Phase II: n=160; Phase III: n=344), NH600001 0.25 mg/kg achieved noninferior endoscopy success compared with etomidate 0.30 mg/kg, while the 0.20 and 0.30 mg/kg doses did not meet noninferiority criteria. NH600001 reduced adrenocortical depression relative to etomidate as assessed by peri-procedural cortisol dynamics.

Key Findings

  • NH600001 0.25 mg/kg was noninferior to etomidate 0.30 mg/kg for endoscopy success in Phase II (rate difference 5.0%, 95% CI −4.49 to 14.49).
  • NH600001 0.20 and 0.30 mg/kg did not meet noninferiority criteria for procedural success versus etomidate.
  • Peri-procedural cortisol assessments indicated reduced adrenocortical depression with NH600001 compared with etomidate.

Clinical Implications

NH600001 (0.25 mg/kg) may be preferred for GI endoscopy sedation in patients at risk for adrenal suppression or in settings where preserving adrenocortical function is desirable, while preserving procedural success.

Why It Matters

Introduces a clinically actionable sedative that maintains efficacy while mitigating etomidate’s hallmark endocrine adverse effect (adrenocortical suppression). Findings are from two rigorous, head-to-head RCTs.

Limitations

  • Abstract provides limited detail on cortisol AUC results and longer-term adrenal outcomes.
  • Generalizability may be limited by single-country (China) setting and endoscopy-specific context.

Future Directions

Clarify dose–response around 0.25 mg/kg; evaluate broader procedural contexts and higher-risk endocrine populations; and quantify adrenal recovery and clinical outcomes beyond 24–48 hours.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Two multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trials with active comparator.
Study Design
OTHER