Skip to main content

Comparative effects of drugs for adults with overweight or obesity: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)2026-07-10PubMed
Total: 85.5Innovation: 7Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

Across 262 RCTs, tirzepatide, CagriSema, and semaglutide produced the largest one-year weight loss but with higher GI adverse events and discontinuations. Subcutaneous semaglutide uniquely reduced all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction; both semaglutide and tirzepatide reduced heart failure risk, while most agents did not meaningfully improve quality of life.

Key Findings

  • At one year, tirzepatide (~−14.9%), CagriSema (~−14.8%), and semaglutide (oral ~−10.9%; subcutaneous ~−9.8%) led weight loss versus lifestyle alone.
  • GI adverse events and discontinuations were more frequent with orforglipron, naltrexone-bupropion, liraglutide, phentermine-topiramate, CagriSema, and oral semaglutide.
  • Subcutaneous semaglutide reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.81) and myocardial infarction (RR 0.72); semaglutide and tirzepatide reduced heart failure risk.
  • Quality-of-life improvements generally did not exceed minimally important differences.

Clinical Implications

Select agents based on individualized benefit–risk: prioritize semaglutide where cardiovascular benefit is desired; counsel about GI adverse events; set realistic expectations for quality-of-life change; integrate lifestyle and resistance exercise to preserve lean mass.

Why It Matters

This synthesis provides the most current, comparative, and methodologically rigorous map of efficacy–safety trade-offs across modern anti-obesity agents, directly informing shared decision-making and policy.

Limitations

  • Substantial heterogeneity and reliance on indirect comparisons for several agents
  • Quality-of-life outcomes showed limited improvements despite weight loss, and emerging agents had low-certainty evidence

Future Directions

Head-to-head RCTs for leading agents, standardized adverse event and QoL reporting, long-term cardiometabolic outcomes, and strategies to preserve lean mass during pharmacotherapy.

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Treatment
Evidence Level
I - Synthesis of randomized controlled trials with network meta-analysis and GRADE
Study Design
OTHER