Daily Sepsis Research Analysis
Three clinically oriented sepsis-related studies stand out today: a multicenter neonatal cohort challenges universal empiric antibiotics during therapeutic hypothermia, a prospective ED study shows antimicrobial stewardship shifts prescribing toward WHO Access agents without harming outcomes, and a nationwide analysis links hospital setting to differing peritoneal dialysis complications including sepsis. Together, they emphasize selective, data-driven antibiotic use and system-level influences o
Summary
Three clinically oriented sepsis-related studies stand out today: a multicenter neonatal cohort challenges universal empiric antibiotics during therapeutic hypothermia, a prospective ED study shows antimicrobial stewardship shifts prescribing toward WHO Access agents without harming outcomes, and a nationwide analysis links hospital setting to differing peritoneal dialysis complications including sepsis. Together, they emphasize selective, data-driven antibiotic use and system-level influences on sepsis risk.
Research Themes
- Antimicrobial stewardship and selective antibiotic use
- System-level determinants of sepsis risk and outcomes
- Diagnostic yield and biomarker interpretation in suspected sepsis
Selected Articles
1. Antibiotic use in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy undergoing therapeutic hypothermia: time to rethink universal empirical treatment.
In a multicenter retrospective cohort of 302 neonates with HIE undergoing therapeutic hypothermia, culture-proven early-onset sepsis was only 0.6% despite 92% receiving empiric antibiotics for a median of 6 days. Biomarkers fluctuated with cooling/rewarming and were not predictive, supporting selective, risk-based antibiotic initiation rather than universal empiric therapy.
Impact: Challenges the default use of universal empiric antibiotics in a high-risk neonatal population, providing concrete incidence data and highlighting biomarker limitations during hypothermia.
Clinical Implications: Adopt a selective, risk-based approach to empiric antibiotics in HIE neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia, with close monitoring and early de-escalation; develop protocols for interpreting CRP/PCT during cooling.
Key Findings
- Culture-proven early-onset sepsis occurred in 2/302 neonates (0.6%) despite 92% receiving empiric antibiotics.
- Median empiric antibiotic duration was 6 days; nearly universal blood culture sampling (99.3%).
- CRP, PCT, and leukocyte counts fluctuated during cooling/rewarming and were not predictive of EOS.
- Number Needed to Treat to prevent one confirmed infection in the selective-use NICU was 111.
Methodological Strengths
- Multicenter design with contrasting antibiotic strategies across two NICUs
- Near-complete blood culture acquisition and detailed biomarker tracking
Limitations
- Retrospective design with potential residual confounding and selection bias
- Only two European NICUs; generalizability may be limited
Future Directions: Prospective or cluster-randomized studies to test risk-based algorithms, integration of rapid diagnostics, and biomarker calibration during hypothermia to guide initiation and duration.
UNLABELLED: Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) can alter the immune system and may present symptoms similar to sepsis. This has led to widespread use of empirical antibiotics, despite limited evidence that support the need for universal empirical treatment. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of culture-proven sepsis and current antibiotic use patterns in neonates undergoing TH. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including term and near-term neonates with HIE treated with TH in two European NICUs with different antibiotic strategies: one with universal empirical antibiotics (Italy, n = 228) and one with selective use (Belgium, n = 74). We collected data on blood culture results, antibiotic exposure, inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, PCT, leukocytes), and clinical outcomes. Of 302 newborns (276 term and 26 late preterm) who underwent TH, 278 (92%) received antibiotics at birth, with varying regimens for a median of 6 days. Blood cultures were performed in 228 Italian babies and in 72/74 Belgian infants (300 in total, equal to 99.3%), revealing only 2 cases of culture-confirmed early-onset sepsis (0.6%). In Belgium, all cultures from eight infants with clinical suspicion of sepsis were negative, resulting in a Number Needed to Treat (NNT) of 111 to prevent one confirmed infection. Late-onset sepsis occurred in four of 302 patients (1.3%). Biomarkers (CRP, PCT, leukocytes) fluctuated during cooling and rewarming but were not predictive of EOS.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of confirmed early-onset sepsis in neonates with HIE undergoing TH was very low, despite extensive empirical antibiotic use. These findings question the necessity for routine universal empiric antibiotics and advocate for a selective risk-based approach based on clinical assessment. Careful monitoring and prudent antibiotic use are crucial to reduce unnecessary exposure and its potential harms in this vulnerable population.
WHAT IS KNOWN: • Distinguishing the symptoms of HIE from those of EOS at birth or shortly thereafter is very complex, as they are often similar and can mimic one another. • Most newborns receiving hypothermic treatment are treated with empirical antibiotics in the suspicion of sepsis, even though the incidence of early-onset sepsis in the European healthcare context is very low. WHAT IS NEW: • Our multicentric study found a remarkably low incidence of confirmed EOS in newborns undergoing TH, irrespective of the antibiotic strategy used in each single center. • We provide data that can support a restriction on the use of empirical antibiotic therapy in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia, also considering the bacterial resistance that the imprudent use of antibiotics is turning into a global emergency.
2. Impact of a persuasive antimicrobial stewardship program on antibiotic use in patients admitted to emergency department for urinary tract infections: a multicentre prospective study.
In a prospective multicenter ED cohort (n=657), a single center implementing a persuasive AMS program increased microbiological diagnoses (67% vs 43.1%) and shifted empiric therapy toward WHO Access antibiotics (48.3% vs 37%) without worsening 7- or 30-day mortality, despite higher baseline severity including more sepsis/septic shock.
Impact: Demonstrates real-world ED stewardship can improve diagnostic yield and favor narrower-spectrum Access agents without compromising short-term outcomes in patients, many of whom present with sepsis physiology.
Clinical Implications: EDs can implement persuasive AMS to promote Access-class empiric choices and culture acquisition even among sicker patients, with monitoring for outcomes; consider scale-up via cluster designs.
Key Findings
- AMS center had higher microbiological diagnosis rates (67% vs 43.1%, p<0.001).
- Empiric prescribing of WHO Access antibiotics increased (48.3% vs 37%, p=0.04).
- No differences in 7-day or 30-day mortality and 7-day clinical response despite higher baseline sepsis/septic shock in AMS group.
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective multicenter design across 8 EDs
- Objective outcomes with prespecified primary and secondary endpoints
Limitations
- Non-randomized design with only one AMS intervention center; potential confounding by site-level factors
- Imbalance in group sizes and baseline severity
Future Directions: Conduct cluster-randomized or stepped-wedge trials to evaluate ED AMS models, integrate rapid diagnostics, and assess longer-term outcomes and resistance patterns.
BACKGROUND: The spread of antibiotic resistance makes it necessary to implement Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Programs; the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an AMS program in the management of urinary tract infection (UTI) in emergency setting. METHODS: A prospective multicentre study was conducted enrolling all adult patients admitted to one of the 8 emergency departments participating in the study with a diagnosis of UTI from February 2023 to July 2024. Only one of the eight centers received a persuasive AMS program. The primary outcome evaluated was the prevalence of empirical antimicrobial prescription belonging to Access class according to WHO classification in AMS and non-AMS ED; secondary outcomes included the prevalence of etiologial diagnosis, the clinical response and seven-day and 30-day mortality rates. RESULTS: During the study period, 657 patients were enrolled, 135 in the AMS and 522 in the non-AMS group, with a median age of 71 years (IQR 58-79). Patients in the AMS group had a more severe disease with a higher rate of sepsis or septic shock at admission (p < 0.001). In the AMS group, the percentage of patients with a microbiological diagnosis was higher (67% vs 43.1% p < 0.001); regarding empirical antibiotic therapy, drugs of the Access class were more frequently prescribed as empirical treatment in the AMS group (48.3 vs 37%, p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of 7- and 30-day mortality and 7-day clinical response between the 2 groups, despite the higher severity of patients in the AMS group. CONCLUSIONS: In the centre where an AMS program was conducted, an increase in the number of positive urine cultures (67% vs 43.1%) has been observed, and a higher rate of prescriptions for Access class antibiotics. Further prospective data are needed to evaluate the impact of AMS intervention on antimicrobial prescribing in emergency setting.
3. Comparative clinical and economic outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in urban teaching, urban non-teaching, and rural hospitals in the United States: a nationwide analysis from the National Inpatient Sample.
In a nationwide cohort of 99,528 PD hospitalizations, urban non-teaching hospitals had lower mortality and metabolic complications but higher risks of PD peritonitis and sepsis (OR 1.13) versus urban teaching hospitals; rural hospitals showed similar patterns of increased peritonitis. Length of stay and costs were lower in urban non-teaching and rural settings.
Impact: Links hospital setting to differential infection risks, including sepsis, in PD patients at national scale, informing targeted prevention and resource allocation strategies.
Clinical Implications: Standardize PD catheter care and infection prevention protocols across settings, with heightened surveillance for peritonitis and sepsis in urban non-teaching and rural hospitals; consider system-level quality interventions.
Key Findings
- Urban non-teaching hospitals had lower mortality (OR 0.76) but higher PD peritonitis (OR 1.25) and sepsis (OR 1.13) vs urban teaching hospitals.
- Rural hospitals had lower metabolic acidosis and volume overload but higher PD peritonitis risk (OR 1.18) and hemodialysis need (OR 1.12).
- Length of stay decreased by 1.5 days (urban non-teaching) and 0.5 days (rural); costs decreased by $31,632 and $10,376, respectively.
Methodological Strengths
- Very large, nationally representative sample with multivariable adjustment
- Comparative analysis across multiple hospital settings
Limitations
- Retrospective administrative data prone to coding errors and unmeasured confounding
- Outcomes limited to in-hospital events; no post-discharge follow-up
Future Directions: Implement and evaluate standardized PD infection prevention bundles and telehealth-supported training in settings with higher peritonitis/sepsis; explore causal drivers via mixed-methods.
OBJECTIVE: Hospital settings may influence outcomes and resource utilization in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, data on PD outcomes across hospital settings remain limited. This study aims to evaluate characteristics, in-hospital treatments, complications, and healthcare costs for PD patients in urban teaching, urban non-teaching, and rural hospitals across the United States. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database in the United States from 2003 to 2018. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were employed to compare in-hospital treatment outcomes, mortality, and healthcare costs across hospital settings, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 99,528 hospitalized ESKD patients receiving PD were included. Among these patients, 60,833 (61%) were in urban teaching hospitals, 32,714 (33%) in urban non-teaching hospitals, and 5,981 (6%) were in rural hospitals. In multivariable analysis, patients in urban non-teaching hospitals had lower risk of PD catheter adjustments (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97), hyperkalemia (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.95), metabolic acidosis (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.78), volume overload (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95), and mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93) but higher risk of PD peritonitis (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36), and sepsis (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24), compared with urban teaching hospitals. Meanwhile, patients in rural hospitals had a lower risk of metabolic acidosis (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.90) and volume overload (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.89) but higher need for hemodialysis (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19), and risk of PD peritonitis (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13-1.24). Urban non-teaching and rural care were associated with lower hospitalization length of stays by 1.5 and 0.5 days and costs by $31632 and $10376, respectively. CONCLUSION: Rural and urban non-teaching hospitals experienced fewer metabolic complications and less volume overload but faced higher rates of PD-related peritonitis compared to urban teaching hospitals. These findings highlight clinical and economic differences in PD across hospital settings in the United States and crucial strategies for personalizing PD care and optimize resources. Future research should explore system-level interventions to enhance PD delivery in diverse healthcare settings.